Either way, Model Airplane News printed it as it reads, which is 100% wrong. Had they known what they were doing they would have caught it and corrected it or not printed it. They have a responsibioity to proof read their stuff since they sell it. They have a greater responsibility to publish information that is true and correct.

That's the peoblem here. M.A.N. is publishing all kinds of tripe pertaining to gas engine use. That includes the way the RCS 50 was tested in the last issue or so. Toss in their comments about Coleman fuel from their resident "experts" along with how ethanol is damaging our carbs and engines and all you end up with is a bunch of people that don't have a clue leading newbies down the wrong path.

Yes, you can separate a large portion of water from gas by adding more water and agitating but you better have a clear window to see where the separation occurs and draw fuel from the top. The people at M.A.N. evidently don't know this.