RCU Forums - View Single Post - another darn ryobi post (ryobi performance modification, analysis and comparison)
Old 03-13-2009, 09:44 PM
  #208  
combatpilot
Senior Member
 
combatpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: springfield, MO
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: another darn ryobi post (ryobi performance modification, analysis and comparison)

edit: OH, SORRY. I MISSED YOUR POINT! You saw no change from stock to modified clamp plate to waist cut reed, right? Gee I don't know what's going on then. Maybe there is some distortion of the reed or a sideways twist or something on the reed with a bean hole in it.


Yea i dont know whats going on here either. tell ya what i will mail you a waist cut reed and you mail me the bean cut reed and we can each try these and see if we get the same reults again. I am wondering if it would be worthwhile for you to do your test again. I had done my reed valve twice and got two different results to.

Again in my first testing of test #7 reed valves

stock valve RPM 7050
modified reed valve 7410
rubber reed valve 7410

Second testing of test #7 reed valves

stock valve RPM 7410
modified reed valve 7410
rubber reed valve 7410
I have my suspicions as to why there is no change in performance.
At this rate i just cant see what a y manifold with a two reed set up would do.