RCU Forums - View Single Post - Ed Kazmirski's Taurus
View Single Post
Old 04-08-2009, 08:48 AM
  #1218  
kingaltair
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Ed Kazmurski's Taurus


ORIGINAL: UStik

..... normal people to upgrade to T2 standard. In this case/phase that meant swept wing, more dihedral and shorter tail. As you wrote before, Ed soon realized this to be wrong, and even though the Japan T2 flies quite well the final T2 is noticeably better. If Ed had reduced the dihedral further he would have had an even better ship.

A more technical explanation could be the symmetric airfoil. Due to the absence of down pitching moment quite small static stability margins are practicable, and they are desirable for neutral flight behavior. But this in turn might require a longer tail and shorter nose for better damping.
HUH???[:-]

Define "static stability" and "damping" auf English bitte

Duane