ORIGINAL: UStik
The really annoying thing is that the MAN plan shows a 1" longer tail cone than the RCM&E plan, while Ed's real contest model at the time is even another 1" longer. So the VRCS Taurus is not standard Top Flite in tail cone length, but all else is standard. Can you explain that?
No sorry UStik, not to you, not when you are believing in building an Taurus by using sketches on crude brown paper. I have a limitation in my phantasy.
For me it is no question, "Top Flite Preproduction Taurus", read my posts on page 5,6 Ed Kazmirski's Taurus.
BTW: Do not react with, I forget the audio tapes! Nonsense!
Cees