RE: Redesign and reconstruction of the Oldest Taurus on Earth
I fail to see any connection between my questions and that post. Is there a riddle here? What am I missing? I understand what was said in that post. It's very clear.
OK, I'm ready for you to answer directly, without referring to another thread or writing a riddle or some obtuse ruse. The question is Do you mean that you do not believe people can build from "sketches on crude brown paper?" Or that somebody building a Taurus that way is not building a "real" Taurus?
The possible options are:
a) YES. YES.
b) YES. NO.
c) NO. YES.
d) NO. NO.
After selecting option (a) thru (d), a sentence or two of explanation/clarification is suitable.
It's really not as hard to answer as you're making it. You could have saved both of us a lot of time searching thru the threads by simply answering the question directly. It would have saved frustration and typing on both sides of the Atlantic, too.
Andy
PS - Did you decide if you're going to make the fin on the new plane more Taurus-like or are you going to leave it with the extra rake? I didn't find an answer earlier. Thanks!