ORIGINAL: jeffie8696
Ithink the 52 can replace a 40 2stroke but not much more. Still, it has its positive attributes.
ORIGINAL: jeffie8696
Ithink the 52 can replace a 40 2stroke but not much more. Still, it has its positive attributes.
I agree. The 52 four stroke is barely the equivalent to a ball bearing 40 two stroke. The 61 four stroke I have is barely the equivalent to a Thunder Tiger 46 pro. My61 is actually in long term storage, its to heavy for 30 sized planes and it just barely gets the job done on 40 size planes. I like the 70 four strokes a lot better on 40 size planes.