ORIGINAL: Thomas B
While some will think it is sacreligious to discuss the modification of a safety rule, I would like to think that somethingcontroversial could be openlydiscussed witha minimum ofdrama andheated arguement.Let me set some ground rules...I would like this to be an open minded, honest and respectful discussion of the following AMA rule:
AMA Safety Code Rule number 4: I will not fly my model in sanctioned events, airshows and model demostrations until it has been proven airworthy.
//SNIP//
Given this experience, I haveseveral personal opinions on rule 4.
1. I feel that AMA park type models flown at fly in type events should not be subject to rule 4 as currently written, given the inherent low risk of 2 lb models flying at less than 60 mph.
2. I think that at fly in, airshow and model demotype events, it would be safe to atleastallow first flightsbefore and after event hours,
3. I think that it could be possible to safely allow first flights during fly inevent hours, witha safety inspection before flight and with the event management taking steps to keep all eventpilots, staff and spectatorsalert and safe during first flights..
What do you think?
#1.
I disagree. No exceptions. If you wish to fly in these events then be ready to run with the big dogs or stay under the porch.
#2.
As an AMA CD since Feb. 1963, I do so. When Carl Maroney was AMA's insurance guru, he was pushing that the sanction was a 24 hour thing, midnight to midnight, and as such all rules were in that time frame. Carl was as fine a gentleman as could be in this worldly world, but just a tad on the "fixed vision" list. As I stated in another forum somewhere in answer to this question, if AMA wishes to change my operation, then they can do so, or at least provide me with more detailed instructions. Right now, no maidens during business hours, however prior to and after official flying, thenfield is open to normal flying rules.
#3.
Not just NO but "L- NO". In true competition there is really no time for such time-breaks. In Fly-Ins or Fun-Flys, you are taking up the time of the paying customers. You obviously are not a seasoned Contest Director, as you would know that such delays will create much alarm among the cattle.
a. If one has that chance then all should have it. Won't work. One guy loses a flight that may have been a winning flight, because someone else received special treatment when he came NOT PREPARED.The P& Ms fly fast and furious.Then after the event you will be filling out
Protest answers while everyone else is playing Happy-Hour.
b. Are YOU going to make the decision that an unproven model is safe to fly? I definitely no longer do so. The pilot signs a form stating he and the airplane are good-to-go. That is then his decision. If by chance he is found to have signed an untrue statement, then he gets direction to the gate and beyond.
c. The current procedure seems to work well enough. I see no need to have more restrictions. If one comes to an event with a new untested machine, not early enough to test prior to the advertised start time, then place it in the display area and have a beer.