RCU Forums - View Single Post - Is it time to revisit AMA safety code rule 4 ?:
Old 06-28-2009 | 09:46 AM
  #51  
KidEpoxy's Avatar
KidEpoxy
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: San Antonio, TX
Default RE: Is it time to revisit AMA safety code rule 4 ?:

P51
You forgot to limit your Non-Waiver Exemption example
to just Electric Non-Waiver models,
cause the OP is putting forth some idea that a Quiet 2/60 is safer than a Glow 2/60,
so the non-waivers must be even safer when quiet, by his logic



Maybe the OP would use the simple test of insurance to draw the line of what is safer than what:
ONLY the ppp models do not require the millions of dollars of AMA insurance to fly at AMA club fields,
so perhaps ONLY ppp should be exempted by his plan to gut/hamstring SC#4

AMA has already made tiers of safety.
P51 mentioned the Waiver / NoWaiver model division
And I cite the $Mils / sub-$Mil division of Insurance by model


I cant wait to hear the rational
on how a 2oz rubber FF wouldnt fit the OP 'risk' exemption plan cause its not PPP-worthy