RCU Forums - View Single Post - Reply to FEJ Pipe thread closure
View Single Post
Old 08-21-2009 | 06:54 AM
  #21  
rhklenke's Avatar
rhklenke
My Feedback: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,005
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 21 Posts
From: Richmond, VA
Default RE: Reply to FEJ Pipe thread closure


ORIGINAL: Hajo77

In my opinion the counting of all FEJ pipe failures did not make real sense in the first place. You never know if those planes mentioned have been built / maintained appropriately. We all know there is a lot one can do wrong. Not saying that this was the case with Andy's F-18 but there is still too much room for guessing. I always double&triple check everything on my planes, particularly when I know that I bought ''cheap''. I exchanged a Feibao pipe because it looked like it got too hot, so I am better safe than sorry right?

One of the failures mentioned in one of the threads made me think:

ยด1 F15 1/9, with merlin 160 pipe failure after 3 fligth, serious damage on the rear'

No idea if it makes sense to build a 160N engine in a plane which was designed around 60-80N engines. I think it doesn't I dont think that I can blame the manufacturer when I mount a ferrari engine into a volkswagen and the brakes fail at some point. [8D]

FEJ would make a big mistake giving in anyways after all this bashing. It would just show that tons public ranting is enough to get a free kit once someone vaporized their jet.
Sorry, but a 1/9 F-15 won't even get off the ground with a 60N engine and its underpowered with an 80N engine. This aircraft is a 120N machine and 160N, while at the upper end of what's reasonable, is not an unreasonable engine for this plane.

I'll ask you the same question that I ask everyone that comes to their defense, how many FEJ aircraft have *you* built and flown, and how many times?

Bob