RCU Forums - View Single Post - Curious, what is the draw to the "Nano" turbines
Old 11-04-2009 | 05:44 AM
  #4  
jason's Avatar
jason
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,370
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: kenilworth , UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: Curious, what is the draw to the


ORIGINAL: LGM Graphix

I'm wondering what the draw is to the nano turbines.

but it just seems like a huge investment to strap to some foam.

Again, not bashing, just wondering, so for those of you who have them, or are planning to get one, what is the reason behind it?

One of the reasons I like them is that I like the idea of strapping them to a cheapo foamy. I don't think there’s a valid argument that just because you have an engine that’s costs thousands then you also need an airframe that costs thousands too. I'd prefer to spend say £1500 on a small engine and fit it to £200 worth of airframe than £3000 worth. You can have a lot of fun with them and if you crash them the chances of breaking the engine is way less than anything else. I had a bad hand launch on my JJJ powered funjet and it did 5 cart wheels across the grass at 240k rpm and tore the nose off the funjet. I taped it back on flew it for the rest of the day. Unfortunately that was the only days flying I got out of that engine...Also take the MW44 for instance, I've seen plenty of planes crash with these engines in over the years and the engines always seem to get away with it. It must me down the lower inertia but you pile anything else in and the engine in most cases comes out squashed[&o] It's also just a case of throwing the model in the back of the car with half a gallon of fuel and going flying for the day.

Jason