ORIGINAL: bradpaul
Kid, you can spin it how you want, but I personally feel the AMA would be benefitted by promoting the establishment of PP fields sponsered by AMA Clubs and open to both AMA and non AMA flyers.
The AMA would only insure the landowner, and AMA members. The non AMA flyers would have to cover any claims from there own resources or other insurance.
Now my evil plan is that this would both promote model aviation and grow both AMA membership and even regular AMA Club membership as the PP flyers progress in the sport.
Brad
The AMA presently has
no control over who flies at a flyng field. The landowner, be it a public or private entity, has exclusive power to say who does or does not have use of the facilities.
Surely you weren't suggesting that the AMA include non-AMA members in it's landowner coverage. I don't read your postto say that but otherwise I don't get the point of the post in general.