Fair and equal moderation at the AMA's board?
Lets evaluate an act of moderation from there:
(as to not be accused of just yanking a soundbite,
the entire moderators post is quoted from AMA's forum)
OF course, your "n" here is very small (48) and therefore any analysis of the results is statistically invalid as it is NOT a random sampling.
KE, please cease the recreational arguing or I'll be forced to delete your posts as they contribute nothing to the discussion.
Peter+
here we have an example of the moderator in just one single post
both disputing a previous comment I made, in true Receational Arguement form (erroneous counterpoint),
and in the very same post directing me NOT to post any more on the subject.
He can take a erroneous
potshot at my comments
(no, I am not going to get into his error details here),
but it appears
his 'contribute nothing' recreational arguments are protected by ... well, him being moderator.
Fair and Equal?
Sure, its just that some are more equal than others.
We discuss AMA here at RCU,
and have been quoting and citing what the AMA says and does for years.
If the previous posters in this thread are discussing actions by ama
( of ama's appointed moderators on AMAs board)
seems that is as valid a RCU AMA forum topic as AMAs actions or appointees on the contest board or tech director or any other AMA activity or ama published (including web) text, that we have quoted or cited in the past