ORIGINAL: cj_rumley
An actual government agency, then. An agency with an environmental issue particular to one site. Still quite a different reason for the demise of the previous attempt to build a regional flying site that you represented in your retort to Lawrence. Here's refresher for you
Regardless, I stand by my opinion that your desire to build a District flying site is an inefficient use of the time of the DVP, is not financially viable, and represents a clear lack of understanding of the how and what of the previous effort.
How so?? My point is that the circumstances do the loss of the first District site have changed the game when it comes to a new one. The AMA EC will look at the financial investments not to mention the time required and so on. And based on the previous experience is very unlikely to approve this concept.
It's called "learning from the past". You have no doubt heard the quote "Those that ignore the past are doomed to repeat it"?