ORIGINAL: iflyj3
ORIGINAL: HH
This article is an important read,especially to the Non-AMA and anti AMA crowd. Hossfly is absolutely correct. So is Dave Mathewson.
Yes, I have read the treatise and it is well written. I have also read the ones in the past. About three years from now, review my #6 post in the forum and see if I was right.
Dan-
You are right, and I don't need to reread your Post #6 to know that. DM's message was well thought out and polished. OTOH the (as yet to be approved) minutes of the EC meeting that record more candidly 'a synopsis of AMA and FAA proceedings' that were central to Dave's article don't provoke the same warm and fuzzy feelings. Presentation of the issues and status of proceedings regarding the future of our interests as modelers from all available sources, easy enough as they are somewhat disturbingly too rare, should be considered before lining up to play 'follow the leader.'
Cletus