RCU Forums - View Single Post

05-05-2010 | 11:42 AM

#15

DarZeelon

Senior Member

Joined: Apr 2003

Posts: 8,913

Likes: 0

Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

From: Rosh-HaAyin, ISRAEL

RE: Evolution 61

Quote:

ORIGINAL: spaceworm

...I did not profess to be getting maximum performance from my engine fuel combination, and I stated what the magazine reviewer said about the muffler used with the engine I have. Have you read the article and do you take issue with his inputs? I am satisfied with what I am getting with the fuel/oil I am using, as I am sure you are with your MVVS engines, nitro and tuned pipe. We are talking apples and kumquats here. I do not care to use an MVVS, nitro, or a tuned pipe, and am obviously not concerned with ''B***s out high performance. I am sure most everyone by now knows how high performing your MVVS engines are, please don't bother telling me again. Thank you very much.

SW,

I resent what you are suggesting... as well as the language you're using to do it.

I was neither 'showing-off' the performance of MVVS engines, nor was I offering such an engine to you (none at all to sell).

I was just demonstrating how substandard your setup is; compared with a properly running engine of the same displacement.
I could have put an OS.91FX there; of which your engine is a China made clone, to show similar results, but I have no RPM readings on record for this engine.

And as to you not giving performance much importance; you're wrong!

To achieve its best economy, reliability and longevity, any engine must be set-up and run in a state that would maximize its performance potential, in any state that it is in.

Your Evolution engine is currently making 'sewer grade' performance, even if your FAI fuel and 'standard' exhaust are put into the equation.

Perhaps it is just the 'chokey' muffler that's on it...

Reply Like