Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Aerodynamics
 Is this possible? >

Is this possible?

Community
Search
Notices
Aerodynamics Discuss the physics of flight revolving around the aerodynamics and design of aircraft.

Is this possible?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2010 | 08:25 AM
  #26  
Lnewqban's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,057
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: South Florida
Default RE: Is this possible?

You are very welcome, Larry.

We all are happy to see that you got out of your initial confusion.

While the RCU server was down, I finished another schematic.
I am posting it anyway, just in case it can help somebody else in the future.

Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Yw67919.jpg
Views:	30
Size:	49.1 KB
ID:	1528162  
Old 11-30-2010 | 10:51 AM
  #27  
BMatthews's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 12,432
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
From: Chilliwack, BC, CANADA
Default RE: Is this possible?



No problem Larry.  Part of why a lot of us hang around here is a combination of helping out and solving the mental brain teasers.  Sometimes those brain teasers seem obvious to us but the ideas aren't all that easy to pass on in a way that makes sense.  Some manage that easily with few words while I tend to come up with a lot of different ways, throw them all and see which one sticks....

With your new understanding you're now equipped to deal with the dreaded "downwind turn" issue.... </p>
Old 11-30-2010 | 03:03 PM
  #28  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default RE: Is this possible?

Is it to keep a more constant ground speed and vertical lines straighter?

ORIGINAL: Jim Thomerson

Now you see why in Control Line Precision Aerobatics, we fly the square loops (and other maneuvers) on the down wind side of the circle.
Old 11-30-2010 | 03:25 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,517
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Near Pfafftown NC
Default RE: Is this possible?

ORIGINAL: flythesky
ORIGINAL: Jim Thomerson

Now you see why in Control Line Precision Aerobatics, we fly the square loops (and other maneuvers) on the down wind side of the circle.

Is it to keep a more constant ground speed and vertical lines straighter?

It's mostly to keep the lines tight. It does make the maneuvers more uniform as well as it pushes equally from the sides if you center the maneuver well.

BTW, it's possible to fly CL without the engine running with a bit of wind. When you are doing it, you can get energy by doing exactly that, centering maneuvers downwind.
Old 11-30-2010 | 04:26 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Palmdale, CA
Default RE: Is this possible?

I used to "wind fly" with a Ringmaster.
Built up my whipping skills which came in handy in Budapest in 1960 at the World Champs, on the AMA FAI Control-line team, with the team racers.
Old 12-01-2010 | 01:25 AM
  #31  
BMatthews's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 12,432
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
From: Chilliwack, BC, CANADA
Default RE: Is this possible?

It is also normal to situate the judges on the upwind side of the circle.  So to make things look more normal to them you do your stunts directly downwind.  Although the square figure 8's do extend a good way around the circle.... well actually the hemisphere.
Old 12-01-2010 | 03:59 AM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,744
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Cape Town, SOUTH AFRICA
Default RE: Is this possible?

asprin?
Old 12-12-2010 | 10:53 AM
  #33  
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 12,957
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
From: Hesperia Michigan, MI
Default RE: Is this possible?


ORIGINAL: flythesky

<span style="color: rgb(255,0,0)">Comments in red.</span>
ORIGINAL: BMatthews

Yep, the figure you gave are nonsense because you're mixing air, wind and ground speeds up in a salad of confusion. None of your numbers add up to anything that makes sense.

You said-"There is a 20kt wind from left to right and I start from the left at 20kts "

That implies that you are approching the square loop with a tailwind of 20 kts plus a forward airspeed of 20 knots because you're flying downwind for a total ground speed of 40 kts.

You then said- "(I) pull straight up directly iin front of me. I maintain a straight line and slow to 20 kts at the top where I turn into the wind"

Well, since you were already doing 20 kts AIRSPEED when you were flying downwind to enter into the square loop you can't very well slow down in the vetical line to 20 kts. <span style="color: rgb(255,0,0)">I was going 40 kts ground speed, did I somehow lose all of this speed when I pulled up?</span> <span style="color: rgb(255,0,0)">The air (wind) is staionary in respect to the plane now. </span> This is the start of the confusion. But forget that for the moment. So the airplane flew along at 20kt airspeed and pulled vertical and maintained a 20kt airspeed up the line (perhaps thanks to adding power?). <span style="color: rgb(255,0,0)">Throttle management is to understood but not defined.</span> That's fine. As it did so the wind hitting the top of the model along with it's momentum from the 40kt ground speed kept it drifting belly first downwind at 20 kts all while the model was heading up at 20kts. <span style="color: rgb(255,0,0)">I do not understand why you would think that this is happening. By definition a vertical line has no ground speed. </span>

Now you turn the next corner to inverted to fly back into the wind where you said- "...at the top where I turn into the wind, lose 5 kts and continue at 15 kts plus the added wind speed of 20kt for an air speed of 35kts."

So why is this corner costing you 5 kts where the other one didn't? <span style="color: rgb(255,0,0)">The speed loss was not specified but you can see by my previous statement that the plane is slowing down. </span>Let's skip any drag related speed losses in the corners for now even though they certainly occur. So the model flips inverted from the 20kt upline to flying at 20 kts of AIRSPEED into the 20kt headwind that is still coming from the left as per your original statement where both the model AND the wind are coming from the left at 20kts each. <span style="color: rgb(255,0,0)">The plane is traveling up at 20kts when it turned inverted and lost 5kts. This speed is in relation to the ground now and is flying into a 20kt wind. The speed of the air over the plane is now 35kts.</span> So you see where our and your confusion is coming from?<span style="color: rgb(255,0,0)"> I am not confused by my scenario. </span>So anyway, our model has just rotated to inverted and heading back the way it entered and facing the 20 kt wind from that direction. So it sits in the air upside down at zero ground speed apparently defying gravity but is actually very happy because it is still plowing through the passing air at its happy speed of 20 knts. <span style="color: rgb(255,0,0)">You are saying that the upward speed has somehow disappered? Underlying this discussion you seem to be saying that the momentum of a plane continues to move a plane in it's original direction after turning in a new direction. If you dive to the ground and level out do you continue to descend toward the ground at the original diving speed?</span>

So from here you pull the last corner for the downline where you said- "I proceed to the down ward turn and dive straight down while chopping the throttle to a speed of 20kts. At the bottom of the leg I pull level, lose 0kts because gravity helped in keeping the speed up in the turn and proceed at 20kts minus the wind speed of 20kts coming from behind for a net air speed of 0kts and hope I can accelerate to a flying air speed before I hit the ground."

Nope, not the case at all. The model does come down at 20 kts like you say but it also is now being pushed by the drift so by the time you get to the bottom line where you pull back to level the model is being pushed canopy first "upwards" at 20 kts. <span style="color: rgb(255,0,0)">Again, Ican't understand why you think this. You are saying that a plane can't fly in a vertical line in a wind. Ithink it can because Ido it when Ifly. </span>Also it maintains it's speed through the corners because we're ignoring the drag losses in the turns so it pulls out with both 20 kts of airspeed PLUS the 20kts of wind speed from the tail and is immediately flying at 40 kts with out any sign of sag towards the ground.
I got a great Idea...just make a video of your flight you just said you can do. That would be neat! Thanks Capt,n
Old 12-12-2010 | 11:18 AM
  #34  
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,157
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Jupiter , FL
Default RE: Is this possible?

asprin?
I can thing of better things.
Old 12-12-2010 | 07:28 PM
  #35  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default RE: Is this possible?

Well now I know how you think.

ORIGINAL: captinjohn



I got a great Idea...just make a video of your flight you just said you can do. That would be neat! Thanks Capt,n
[/quote]

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.