Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Aerodynamics
Odd CG. Is this right? >

Odd CG. Is this right?

Community
Search
Notices
Aerodynamics Discuss the physics of flight revolving around the aerodynamics and design of aircraft.

Odd CG. Is this right?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-21-2014 | 01:30 PM
  #1  
stevegauth30's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bristol, CT
Default Odd CG. Is this right?

Hi folks. I have a Great Planes turbo raven arf with a swept wing. The manual calls for 5 5/8 at the root. This is also just behind the wing tube. At this point, I'm extremely nose heavy which I wouldn't think I should be having the bigger of the engine size that they recommend. Does this look about right? I put the battery over the wing tube so you could see where it is.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	image.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	218.0 KB
ID:	2024541  
Old 08-21-2014 | 03:30 PM
  #2  
speedracerntrixie's Avatar
My Feedback: (29)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,713
Received 205 Likes on 176 Posts
From: Happy Valley, Oregon
Default

Steve, that looks about right to me. To be safe you can calculate out to see where 30% of MAC is. Another good thing to do would be to compare it to a G-202 of the same size. The Turbo Raven was just a modded G-202.
Old 08-21-2014 | 04:02 PM
  #3  
All Day Dan's Avatar
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,606
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: MANHATTAN BEACH, CA
Default

try this website. Dan.

http://adamone.rchomepage.com/index5.htm
Old 08-21-2014 | 04:28 PM
  #4  
stevegauth30's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bristol, CT
Default

Thanks guys. I consider myself to be a descent builder. I usually build what I fly, so I definitely understand CG, but its the first time I encounter this much sweep. Figuring it from the root, at the widest part of the chord, it works out to be somewhere around 45% MAC. just wanted to be sure. thanks again.
Old 08-24-2014 | 06:22 PM
  #5  
Lownverted's Avatar
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 550
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Palmdale, CA
Default

MAC is not measured at the root chord. Mean Aerodynamic Chord is the AVERAGE chord length. Your MAC will be somewhere mid span, find the CG at that point, then transfer it to the root. That being said, behind the tube seems roughly the right spot. Just want to be clear to hopefully save you from a crash.

Red
Old 08-25-2014 | 01:01 AM
  #6  
stevegauth30's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bristol, CT
Default

Thank you. I did some more research, and spoke with a few people who have experience with this actual airframe, and I'm glad I did. They all say the same thing. "DO NOT MAIDEN AT MANUFACTURERS SUGGESTED CG" appearantly where they say is extremely tail heavy and I should be balancing at 1/2 inch forward of what Seagull recommends.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.