Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Aerodynamics
 thrust to weight ratios >

thrust to weight ratios

Community
Search
Notices
Aerodynamics Discuss the physics of flight revolving around the aerodynamics and design of aircraft.

thrust to weight ratios

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-2004 | 01:55 AM
  #1  
fnp
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: London, UNITED KINGDOM
Default thrust to weight ratios

Can somebody please tell me the the thrust to weight ratio for:
1. Trainer
2. Sport
3. Aerobatic
4. 3D

Thanks
Old 02-12-2004 | 08:14 AM
  #2  
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Deland, FL
Default RE: thrust to weight ratios

ORIGINAL: fnp

Can somebody please tell me the the thrust to weight ratio for:
1. Trainer
2. Sport
3. Aerobatic
4. 3D

Thanks
1. Trainer >0.3:1
2. Sport >0.8:1
3. Aerobatic >1:1 ,
4. 3D >1.5:1, prefer >2:1

My opinion
Old 02-13-2004 | 11:49 PM
  #3  
fnp
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: London, UNITED KINGDOM
Default RE: thrust to weight ratios

great thanks a lot
Old 02-14-2004 | 01:45 AM
  #4  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: gone,
Default RE: thrust to weight ratios

LOL... for full scale maybe...

The average R/C trainer has close to 0.8:1
People don't seem happy with a sport model that doesn't have at least 1.3:1
The average Pattern competition airplane is approaching 1.8:1 now (headed up Most of the Pattern ships at the local fiels will hover at 1/2 to 2/3 throttle)
The 3D guys want 2.5:1... If they can get it, they'd take more and still complain it wasn't enough.
Old 02-14-2004 | 08:17 AM
  #5  
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Deland, FL
Default RE: thrust to weight ratios

Well, you've quoted figures (exagerated a bit) that are GREATER THAN the figures I have. But then notice I was using this curious little symbol > Wonder what that means?

To say that the average sport model has a thrust to weight ratio of greater than 1:1 would be pretty silly.
Old 02-14-2004 | 12:36 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Palmdale, CA
Default RE: thrust to weight ratios

ORIGINAL: Johng

Well, you've quoted figures (exagerated a bit) that are GREATER THAN the figures I have. But then notice I was using this curious little symbol > Wonder what that means?

To say that the average sport model has a thrust to weight ratio of greater than 1:1 would be pretty silly.
.
You'll get used to it.
Old 02-16-2004 | 12:17 AM
  #7  
combatpigg's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 20,448
Received 44 Likes on 40 Posts
From: arlington, WA
Default RE: thrust to weight ratios

It's not uncommon to see a bunch of guys at the field with 3.5 pound planes with 5 pounds of thrust, but if you average them in with the weak sisters, the figure goes way down. In other words trying to establish any averages with sport flyers is meaningless. The other figures for trainers, and 3D sound pretty valid.
Old 02-16-2004 | 10:20 AM
  #8  
My Feedback: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Deland, FL
Default RE: thrust to weight ratios

I guess now is when we would need to define a "sport flyer" airplane then. I mean, these guys the 3 lbs airplane and 5 lbs thrust. Do they come to the field just to go up for a couple laps, loops, rolls, maybe a spin or an inverted pass? or do they use that thrust to hover, etc? To me, the former is the definition of a sport flyer, and the latter would push them into the 3D category. Or are they flying 3D for sport ?
Old 02-16-2004 | 11:18 AM
  #9  
combatpigg's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 20,448
Received 44 Likes on 40 Posts
From: arlington, WA
Default RE: thrust to weight ratios

HI JOHN! A lot of the high powered examples of what I've seen were deltas, Q500, Lazy B, club combat, all being flown for the hell of it, and mostly pretty hard to say came anywhere near the description of 3D aircraft. A lot of guys are catching on to taking foam electric ARFS, and outfitting them for glow. A quick coat of polyurethane fuel proofs them, and they make great sport flyers. The natural tendency to goof off with your sport plane is what spawned 3D, and there are guys hovering their Lazy Bs, Q500s, etc., but I haven't seen any of these sport plane examples cross the line into rolling circles, waterfalls, pinwheels, etc. On the other hand, the run of the mill ARF LEAD SLED TRAINER with a 1hp 40 still shows up in strong enough numbers to bring the average back down into the .75:1 range!

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.