Wng loading
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: St. Catharines, ON,
Originally posted by rctt
[B]What is typical wing loading of 1/4 scale acrobatic sport planes //// caps ,edges / extras in oz per sq feet
[B]What is typical wing loading of 1/4 scale acrobatic sport planes //// caps ,edges / extras in oz per sq feet
When does the plane become noticeably heavy ?
#3
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (1)
Thanks !
I Should not be shy of power /I took a chance and bought a Fuji BT 50 /Got 100 bucks off to boot in early April !
Since have ran and HAND started many times Starts reliable and is swinging a ZINGER Pro 22 -8 at 6800 not bad !
Should be close to 30 LBS Thrust !
But I''m at 31 oz per sq. Most outhers are in the 27 -29 Range /
Thanks for post Ron
I Should not be shy of power /I took a chance and bought a Fuji BT 50 /Got 100 bucks off to boot in early April !
Since have ran and HAND started many times Starts reliable and is swinging a ZINGER Pro 22 -8 at 6800 not bad !
Should be close to 30 LBS Thrust !
But I''m at 31 oz per sq. Most outhers are in the 27 -29 Range /
Thanks for post Ron
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Punta Gorda, FL
In horizontal flight lift is equal and opposite to weight. Lift varies as the square of the airspeed so it takes only about a 5% increase in airspeed to accomodate a 10% increase in weight (or wing loading) at a given coefficient of lift or angle of atack.
In vertical flight thrust is opposed to weight and drag but lift is zero. The plane will be accelerated vertically by how much thrust exceeds the sum of weight and drag. In this case a reduction in weight of 10 % will result in a 10% increase in initial vertical acceleration.
Weight reductions will produce much more noticable improvement in vertical flight than in horizontal flight.
In vertical flight thrust is opposed to weight and drag but lift is zero. The plane will be accelerated vertically by how much thrust exceeds the sum of weight and drag. In this case a reduction in weight of 10 % will result in a 10% increase in initial vertical acceleration.
Weight reductions will produce much more noticable improvement in vertical flight than in horizontal flight.
#7
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (1)
Thanks ollie !
That makes since ! I'm not now so concerned about flyabilty
But more so to landing speeds /I don't want to have to bring her in to hot!!
In figuring wing volume loading /from rodey earler post // do I
multiply wing area in ft by 1.5 or .5 /he called it power of???
thanks ron
That makes since ! I'm not now so concerned about flyabilty
But more so to landing speeds /I don't want to have to bring her in to hot!!
In figuring wing volume loading /from rodey earler post // do I
multiply wing area in ft by 1.5 or .5 /he called it power of???
thanks ron
#8
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Punta Gorda, FL
The landing speed is determined by the stall speed plus a stall margin to allow for gusts and wind shear. Lets say that the stall speed is 25.5 MPH at a wing loading of 32 ounces per square foot (corresponding to a maximum lift coefficient of 1.2). A reduction of wing loading to 29 ounces per square foot would result in a reduction of stall speed to about 24.25 MPH.
If this small reduction in stalling speed doesn't do it for you, consider adding split flaps. This is probably a lot easier modification than a much bigger reduction in weight.
If this small reduction in stalling speed doesn't do it for you, consider adding split flaps. This is probably a lot easier modification than a much bigger reduction in weight.
#10
Senior Member
My Feedback: (16)
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 12,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Locust Grove,
GA
I have flown planes that are considered heavy and had to be careful because they would float the length of the runway during landings. While I am not sure I understand the downside of a heavy plane, if you have the power and correct CG the plane should handle quite well.
#11

My Feedback: (1)
Originally posted by Geistware
I have flown planes that are considered heavy and had to be careful because they would float the length of the runway during landings. While I am not sure I understand the downside of a heavy plane, if you have the power and correct CG the plane should handle quite well.
I have flown planes that are considered heavy and had to be careful because they would float the length of the runway during landings. While I am not sure I understand the downside of a heavy plane, if you have the power and correct CG the plane should handle quite well.
It is possible to get too light though, in which case you have a glider
For modern pattern models which are not too much smaller than a 1/4 scale Cap, etc. you shoot for 1lb / 100 sq in wing area, that seems to work very well.



