Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Aerodynamics
Wng loading >

Wng loading

Community
Search
Notices
Aerodynamics Discuss the physics of flight revolving around the aerodynamics and design of aircraft.

Wng loading

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-2002 | 01:29 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Cardington, OH
Default Wng loading

What is typical wing loading of 1/4 scale acrobatic sport planes //// caps ,edges / extras in oz per sq feet

When does the plane become noticeably heavy ?

How so ? Thanks Ron

I have to shave weight from my extra // need to know how far /// Thanks Ron
Old 07-08-2002 | 02:09 AM
  #2  
WS
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: St. Catharines, ON,
Default Re: Wng loading

Originally posted by rctt
[B]What is typical wing loading of 1/4 scale acrobatic sport planes //// caps ,edges / extras in oz per sq feet
30-35

When does the plane become noticeably heavy ?
When you have no power or run out of airspeed. Don't worry about wing loading, it's power loading that's important
Old 07-08-2002 | 10:50 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Cardington, OH
Default loading

Thanks !
I Should not be shy of power /I took a chance and bought a Fuji BT 50 /Got 100 bucks off to boot in early April !
Since have ran and HAND started many times Starts reliable and is swinging a ZINGER Pro 22 -8 at 6800 not bad !
Should be close to 30 LBS Thrust !

But I''m at 31 oz per sq. Most outhers are in the 27 -29 Range /

Thanks for post Ron
Old 07-08-2002 | 02:00 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,769
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
From: FL
Default Wng loading

Wing loading on big aircraft is not very indicative of how they will fly; a much better measure is wing volume loading.
Old 07-08-2002 | 02:24 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Cardington, OH
Default reply

Can you explain wing volume loading in laymans terms?
Thanks for the time!!
Old 07-08-2002 | 03:10 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Punta Gorda, FL
Default Wing Loading

In horizontal flight lift is equal and opposite to weight. Lift varies as the square of the airspeed so it takes only about a 5% increase in airspeed to accomodate a 10% increase in weight (or wing loading) at a given coefficient of lift or angle of atack.

In vertical flight thrust is opposed to weight and drag but lift is zero. The plane will be accelerated vertically by how much thrust exceeds the sum of weight and drag. In this case a reduction in weight of 10 % will result in a 10% increase in initial vertical acceleration.

Weight reductions will produce much more noticable improvement in vertical flight than in horizontal flight.
Old 07-08-2002 | 03:27 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Cardington, OH
Default Reply

Thanks ollie !
That makes since ! I'm not now so concerned about flyabilty
But more so to landing speeds /I don't want to have to bring her in to hot!!

In figuring wing volume loading /from rodey earler post // do I
multiply wing area in ft by 1.5 or .5 /he called it power of???
thanks ron
Old 07-08-2002 | 04:09 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Punta Gorda, FL
Default Landing Speed

The landing speed is determined by the stall speed plus a stall margin to allow for gusts and wind shear. Lets say that the stall speed is 25.5 MPH at a wing loading of 32 ounces per square foot (corresponding to a maximum lift coefficient of 1.2). A reduction of wing loading to 29 ounces per square foot would result in a reduction of stall speed to about 24.25 MPH.

If this small reduction in stalling speed doesn't do it for you, consider adding split flaps. This is probably a lot easier modification than a much bigger reduction in weight.
Old 07-08-2002 | 04:31 PM
  #9  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Cardington, OH
Default Small amount

Seems like such a small differance for a oz or two !!
Old 07-08-2002 | 04:40 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 12,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Locust Grove, GA
Default Wng loading

I have flown planes that are considered heavy and had to be careful because they would float the length of the runway during landings. While I am not sure I understand the downside of a heavy plane, if you have the power and correct CG the plane should handle quite well.
Old 07-09-2002 | 04:18 AM
  #11  
can773's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Calgary, AB, CANADA
Default Wng loading

Originally posted by Geistware
I have flown planes that are considered heavy and had to be careful because they would float the length of the runway during landings. While I am not sure I understand the downside of a heavy plane, if you have the power and correct CG the plane should handle quite well.
For aerobatics lighter planes have many advantages, they will accelerate and decelerate faster into and out of manuvers, they snap and spin more consistently, and over a wider range of airspeeds, they are less critical of correct throttle management, they have better downline breaking, and better upline power, they are easier to fly at constant airspeed, beleive it or not they handle the wind better. In general a lighter plane will outfly a heavier one.

It is possible to get too light though, in which case you have a glider For modern pattern models which are not too much smaller than a 1/4 scale Cap, etc. you shoot for 1lb / 100 sq in wing area, that seems to work very well.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.