Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Aerodynamics
 Flying Tail VS Conventional Tail >

Flying Tail VS Conventional Tail

Community
Search
Notices
Aerodynamics Discuss the physics of flight revolving around the aerodynamics and design of aircraft.

Flying Tail VS Conventional Tail

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2005 | 11:49 PM
  #26  
Jimmbbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Fresno, CA
Default RE: Flying Tail VS Conventional Tail

ORIGINAL: Bax

The anti-servo tab on the Piper stabilators is not to "de-power" the stabilator, but to provide control feel for the pilot, and give the stabilator a tendency to move to the trimmed position. When the pilot moves the controls, the anti-servo tab provides the resistance the pilot needs. A larger anti-servo tab would give the airplane a heavier control feel. Balancing the size of the tab, the amount of deflection is makes with respect to the amount of deflection of the stabilator is what gives you the control feel you need to safely and effectively control the aircraft.
Bax,

To follow your line of reasoning, if the stabilator tab linkage broke, allowing the tab to float free, the result as experienced by the pilot would be reduced control feel, resulting in "twitchy" pitch response, yes???

Jim
Old 03-25-2005 | 02:26 AM
  #27  
combatpigg's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 20,448
Received 44 Likes on 40 Posts
From: arlington, WA
Default RE: Flying Tail VS Conventional Tail

HI ANDREW, stabilators can be set up to groove nicely. You can cut grass with a well adjusted 120 mph C/L combat plane. You will probably find that anywhere from 1/8"+ or -, up to 1/4"+ or - of throw will do the trick. I have used them with no aerodynamic counterbalance, but I think hinging at 25% chord is considered "full scale".
Old 03-25-2005 | 03:04 AM
  #28  
Bipe Flyer's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,381
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Mission, BC, CANADA
Default RE: Flying Tail VS Conventional Tail

Thanks Chuck.
Old 03-25-2005 | 12:47 PM
  #29  
Bax
My Feedback: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 19,483
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
From: Monticello, IL
Default RE: Flying Tail VS Conventional Tail



[/quote]

Bax,

To follow your line of reasoning, if the stabilator tab linkage broke, allowing the tab to float free, the result as experienced by the pilot would be reduced control feel, resulting in "twitchy" pitch response, yes???

Jim
[/quote]


Yes, reduced or no feel, along with a very-much reduced centering tendency, it any remained at all.

Old 03-26-2005 | 03:50 AM
  #30  
Jimmbbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Fresno, CA
Default RE: Flying Tail VS Conventional Tail

ORIGINAL: Bax
Bax,

To follow your line of reasoning, if the stabilator tab linkage broke, allowing the tab to float free, the result as experienced by the pilot would be reduced control feel, resulting in "twitchy" pitch response, yes???

Jim
Yes, reduced or no feel, along with a very-much reduced centering tendency, it any remained at all.
Regardless of how we reach the conclusion, am glad we agree

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.