Engine/thrust to weight ratio chart
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Sandy,
UT
I was wondering if anyone is aware of a chart that gives basic thrust to weight ratio needed to get the unlimited vertical seen in today's models. I understand that all planes are different and that because of that it is more difficult to pin point needed engine size. I am just interested to see where the cut off would be that would make the big difference between "it flies" to it's really fun to fly".
For example: Phoenix Models Extra 300S 46 ARF .46,57.4"
Wingspan: 57.4" (1460mm)
Weight: 3.52 lbs (1600g)
Length: 50.3 " (1280mm)
Airfoil: Fully-symmetrical, low-wing
I would imagine that the .46 will fly it, but what motor would really allow this plane to perfom?
(Side note, I have no interest in this plane in particular, I just grabbed it as an example.
For example: Phoenix Models Extra 300S 46 ARF .46,57.4"
Wingspan: 57.4" (1460mm)
Weight: 3.52 lbs (1600g)
Length: 50.3 " (1280mm)
Airfoil: Fully-symmetrical, low-wing
I would imagine that the .46 will fly it, but what motor would really allow this plane to perfom?
(Side note, I have no interest in this plane in particular, I just grabbed it as an example.
#2

My Feedback: (36)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Topeka, KS
A 2:1 thrust/weight ratio is what you want. There is a chart somewhere that compares the power loading (oz./cid engine) to performance. If I can remember correctly, something around 200 oz/cu.in. would be unlimited when correctly propped. If anyone has the Andy Lennon book R/C Model Aircraft Design I think the chart is in there.
Steve
Steve



