Wing Polyhedral
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: MS
Hello All,
I'm presently building a Dynaflite Butterfly with a 99" span wing, and my question is what could I expect if I removed the polyhedral from the wing, but left the dihedral? I see gliders with and without the polyhedral. by the way. this is rudder and elevator only plane. Would appreciate your input. I have been flying for several years so the plane being less gentle wouldn't be a problem.
Thanks,
Butch
I'm presently building a Dynaflite Butterfly with a 99" span wing, and my question is what could I expect if I removed the polyhedral from the wing, but left the dihedral? I see gliders with and without the polyhedral. by the way. this is rudder and elevator only plane. Would appreciate your input. I have been flying for several years so the plane being less gentle wouldn't be a problem.
Thanks,
Butch
#2
Originally posted by BBRELAND
Hello All,
I'm presently building a Dynaflite Butterfly with a 99" span wing, and my question is what could I expect if I removed the polyhedral from the wing, but left the dihedral? I see gliders with and without the polyhedral. by the way. this is rudder and elevator only plane. Would appreciate your input. I have been flying for several years so the plane being less gentle wouldn't be a problem.
Thanks,
Butch
Hello All,
I'm presently building a Dynaflite Butterfly with a 99" span wing, and my question is what could I expect if I removed the polyhedral from the wing, but left the dihedral? I see gliders with and without the polyhedral. by the way. this is rudder and elevator only plane. Would appreciate your input. I have been flying for several years so the plane being less gentle wouldn't be a problem.
Thanks,
Butch
Rudder controled models rely on the coupling between the rudder yawing the model and the dihedral converting that yaw into roll. If you remove the outer polyhedral angles then the model will react more slowly to rudder inputs, not faster.
And, as I found out, since the poly is out at the tips where it has more leverage the model will loose much more of it's response than the removed dihedral would suggest at first.
Basically, don't do it. If you're trying to get faster and more powerful response out of the design then move the hinge line to make the rudder larger and use lots of throw. Up to 45 degrees.
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: St. Charles, MO
I agree with BMatthews. But it also depends on the type of airplane you are working with.
I have several glider type models (rudder-elevator) that came with standard dihedral that always seemed to be less than responsive to rudder. When I cut the wings and put in some polyhedral they became really nice flying models. The turns seemed to be flatter which for a glider was nice.
Years ago I flew in the rudder only class of RC competetion, never won but flew. Those models were of a cabin type fuse with standard (a lot compared to today) dihedral wings. They responded very well to rudder inputs and produced a lot of roll.
The Butterfly fits in the first class of model.
I have several glider type models (rudder-elevator) that came with standard dihedral that always seemed to be less than responsive to rudder. When I cut the wings and put in some polyhedral they became really nice flying models. The turns seemed to be flatter which for a glider was nice.
Years ago I flew in the rudder only class of RC competetion, never won but flew. Those models were of a cabin type fuse with standard (a lot compared to today) dihedral wings. They responded very well to rudder inputs and produced a lot of roll.
The Butterfly fits in the first class of model.
#5
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Lancaster, CA,
I'm not familiar with a Butterfly, but as long as you increase the dihedral you won't need to bend the outer sections up. I've never flown a rudder-elevator that only had dihedral, but as a rough guess above 10 degrees should do.
Of course, you could always break out the ol' trigonometry and calculate how much dihedral you'd need so that the tips are in the same location as in the plans.
Dan Nelson
Of course, you could always break out the ol' trigonometry and calculate how much dihedral you'd need so that the tips are in the same location as in the plans.
Dan Nelson




