Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Aerodynamics
Reload this Page >

Airfoil ID

Community
Search
Notices
Aerodynamics Discuss the physics of flight revolving around the aerodynamics and design of aircraft.

Airfoil ID

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-2006, 08:54 PM
  #1  
rainedave
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
rainedave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 6,344
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Airfoil ID

I've attached a pic of the root airfoil from Kimbro's Deception. I was hoping someone might know what type it is. It sort of looks like a laminar flow type since the thickest point is pretty far back. What would its advantages be over an NACA 00xx type? Less drag, I'm guessing.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Us53061.jpg
Views:	7
Size:	50.3 KB
ID:	515064  
Old 08-29-2006, 12:18 AM
  #2  
wellss
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: St. Catharines, ON, CANADA
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Airfoil ID

probably a 63 series. Drag is only lower in a small angle of attack range. Outside of that range, it is significantly higher, contributing to a lower maximum lift.
At low Rn, the drag reduction is negligable.
Old 09-12-2006, 06:19 AM
  #3  
Jim_Purcha
My Feedback: (8)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Airfoil ID

Hey Rainedav, it looks more like a narrow arch support, size 11 or 12 Wing Tip. LOL
Old 09-12-2006, 01:00 PM
  #4  
BMatthews
 
BMatthews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chilliwack, BC, CANADA
Posts: 12,425
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 19 Posts
Default RE: Airfoil ID

It does look like that doesn't it. This sort of shape used to be quite common in pattern ship plans I looked at back in the 70's and 80's. Pappy Debolt in particular was fond of this shape.

At our model sizes it doesn't really work well at reducing drag because it's actually very hard to maintain a proper laminar flow at our typical reynolds number range. What may actually be happening is that the extra drag from the "bad" airflow helps the model to achieve a better constant speed in the verticals. Oddly enough a direct opposite goal to what the airfoil was originally intended for if it really is one of the laminar flow types.

Perhaps Dick Hanson will drop in here and expound more on this since he's probably forgotten more about pattern ships than I've ever known.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.