Airfoil ID
#1
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
Airfoil ID
I've attached a pic of the root airfoil from Kimbro's Deception. I was hoping someone might know what type it is. It sort of looks like a laminar flow type since the thickest point is pretty far back. What would its advantages be over an NACA 00xx type? Less drag, I'm guessing.
#2
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: St. Catharines,
ON, CANADA
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Airfoil ID
probably a 63 series. Drag is only lower in a small angle of attack range. Outside of that range, it is significantly higher, contributing to a lower maximum lift.
At low Rn, the drag reduction is negligable.
At low Rn, the drag reduction is negligable.
#4
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chilliwack, BC, CANADA
Posts: 12,425
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes
on
19 Posts
RE: Airfoil ID
It does look like that doesn't it. This sort of shape used to be quite common in pattern ship plans I looked at back in the 70's and 80's. Pappy Debolt in particular was fond of this shape.
At our model sizes it doesn't really work well at reducing drag because it's actually very hard to maintain a proper laminar flow at our typical reynolds number range. What may actually be happening is that the extra drag from the "bad" airflow helps the model to achieve a better constant speed in the verticals. Oddly enough a direct opposite goal to what the airfoil was originally intended for if it really is one of the laminar flow types.
Perhaps Dick Hanson will drop in here and expound more on this since he's probably forgotten more about pattern ships than I've ever known.
At our model sizes it doesn't really work well at reducing drag because it's actually very hard to maintain a proper laminar flow at our typical reynolds number range. What may actually be happening is that the extra drag from the "bad" airflow helps the model to achieve a better constant speed in the verticals. Oddly enough a direct opposite goal to what the airfoil was originally intended for if it really is one of the laminar flow types.
Perhaps Dick Hanson will drop in here and expound more on this since he's probably forgotten more about pattern ships than I've ever known.