Prop size
#1
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (16)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: spring valley ,
CA
Hi all, just need to clear up a couple of things. I have a RCS 215. The "Test Run" sheet that was included with the engine shows it was bench tested with a 32-18 prop. Now what I would like to know is what effect would putting a 32-12 prop on engine have?. I know there are other factors to consider but when I asked Mike at RCS what prop he would recommend he said a 32-8 and others say that is way to small a pitch for my applacation. I have flow my Waco on a 32-8 and it seemed fine, but I also have used a 32-12 on it and that worked too. Just want to be sure I'm not doing the wrong thing.
#3
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (16)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: spring valley ,
CA
ORIGINAL: beepee
The 32x8 would make for an awfully powerful brake at idle on approach.
Bedford
The 32x8 would make for an awfully powerful brake at idle on approach.
Bedford
Thanks
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Gold Coast QLD, AUSTRALIA
A 32x8 will provide a lot of braking at idle due to the 8" of pitch which is very low for a prop this size. The pitch is the theroetical distance the prop will travel thru a viscous liquid in one rotation, hence the lower the number the slower the plane generally speaking. Hope this clears it up somewhat?
#5
the lower pitch prop is less load on ths engine - so heat build up in cylinders will be less - that is likely why Mike recommended it
-If you set mixture correctly and use throttle carefully (as you mention) - use any prop you like which will make good performance for you and not overspeed or over tax the engine -
the relative prop drag on that model is pretty small.
I would suspect you don't do much full bore flying --
-If you set mixture correctly and use throttle carefully (as you mention) - use any prop you like which will make good performance for you and not overspeed or over tax the engine -
the relative prop drag on that model is pretty small.
I would suspect you don't do much full bore flying --
#6
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (16)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: spring valley ,
CA
ORIGINAL: dick Hanson
the lower pitch prop is less load on ths engine - so heat build up in cylinders will be less - that is likely why Mike recommended it
-If you set mixture correctly and use throttle carefully (as you mention) - use any prop you like which will make good performance for you and not overspeed or over tax the engine -
the relative prop drag on that model is pretty small.
I would suspect you don't do much full bore flying --
the lower pitch prop is less load on ths engine - so heat build up in cylinders will be less - that is likely why Mike recommended it
-If you set mixture correctly and use throttle carefully (as you mention) - use any prop you like which will make good performance for you and not overspeed or over tax the engine -
the relative prop drag on that model is pretty small.
I would suspect you don't do much full bore flying --
Thanks for the info.
Steve




