Sharpening prop LE?
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Is it worth the effort of trying to sharpen the LE of a prop. I'm not talking about changing the airfoil of the prop blade, just sharpening an already sharp LE of a prop. What effect does this have on static thrust, efficiency and top speed?
-Q.
-Q.
#3
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: League City, TX
The leading edge should be dull. Sharp leading edges tends to cause the boundary layer to separate more easily from the top surface of the prop. If anything, you should sharpen the trailing edge. I agree with mikerolls37 though, if you are getting to this point for more power, nothing works better than more cubic inches.
#4
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Ok. I'm going to sharpen the TE and dull the LE. The current LE has small imperfections due to my landing skill
.
The reason I ask is not for absolute power reasons. I just happen to have a prop on a plane that seems to be a bit beaten up and wanted to "restore" some of it's original LE shape, or even improve apon it. I agree, though, that a new and bigger prop would be more beneficial.
-Q.
.The reason I ask is not for absolute power reasons. I just happen to have a prop on a plane that seems to be a bit beaten up and wanted to "restore" some of it's original LE shape, or even improve apon it. I agree, though, that a new and bigger prop would be more beneficial.
-Q.
Originally posted by mtthomps
The leading edge should be dull. Sharp leading edges tends to cause the boundary layer to separate more easily from the top surface of the prop. If anything, you should sharpen the trailing edge. I agree with mikerolls37 though, if you are getting to this point for more power, nothing works better than more cubic inches.
The leading edge should be dull. Sharp leading edges tends to cause the boundary layer to separate more easily from the top surface of the prop. If anything, you should sharpen the trailing edge. I agree with mikerolls37 though, if you are getting to this point for more power, nothing works better than more cubic inches.
#8
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Don't worry. I'm aware of that. The nicks on the prop are very small, but I wanted to minimize their aerodynamic effect.
-Q.
-Q.
Originally posted by Steve Guinn
A prop that is "beaten up" needs to be replaced.
They can fail. Dangerous.
A prop that is "beaten up" needs to be replaced.
They can fail. Dangerous.
#9
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Yip. I'm afraid of that. Fortunately it's a small electric motor (380) with a small prop for direct drive. Also, it's a pusher so my fingers don't get in the way.
-Q.
-Q.
Originally posted by PigMan Buggerus
Sharp LE's can also lead to removed digits!
Sharp LE's can also lead to removed digits!



