Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Aerodynamics
 Reality setting in >

Reality setting in

Community
Search
Notices
Aerodynamics Discuss the physics of flight revolving around the aerodynamics and design of aircraft.

Reality setting in

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-09-2009 | 09:54 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,757
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: San Bernardino Calif
Default Reality setting in

At another forum here, reality is setting in for a couple of readers/respondants.

Apparently they were thinking that just because the box top says "Uses a NACA ____ Airfoil !!" it was the same from root to tip.

Naw.... that ain't necessarily true.

See we have to adjust things a bit out near the wingtip, such that a common 1/4 inch thick slab can be used full length. A 1/4 or 1/2 inch high wing spar does not often get cut down or tapered over the entire length either. All this in order that these easy to find common wood parts can be used with a minimum of sanding or other modifications. We make the airfoil thicker (higher) so that you do not have to sand away everything then in order to make fit or reduce the thinness of the rib/spar sockets.

All this was thought of way back when, and is still being done today. You need not worry any more. That expressed airfoil is only printing then.


Wm.
Old 08-09-2009 | 10:17 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,517
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Near Pfafftown NC
Default RE: Reality setting in

Actually, semi-smart designers make the spar cutout deeper when they wish to use that spar without having to taper it.

Furthermore, smart designers understand how sensible it is to taper a spar thickness and do the work necessary for optimum weight vs strength.

Personally, if I knew that a kit cutter didn't understand the value in following the plans as printed, I'd find another kit cutter. And I wouldn't use plans that had a spar that was just as thick at the tip as it was at the root on a tapered planform. But then I figure the model's performance is more important than doing the kitting at absolute minimum cost and effort.
Old 08-10-2009 | 09:45 PM
  #3  
BMatthews's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 12,432
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
From: Chilliwack, BC, CANADA
Default RE: Reality setting in

This reminds me of how very many variations I've seen for RAF32 airfoils on old time rubber models. With many of them other than the name being given you'd have no idea that they were meant to be the same airfoil.... Coos', since you've been doing a fair bit of OT stuff lately I'm sure you're well familiar with many similar "freedoms" having been taken with the science of aerodynamics.
Old 08-12-2009 | 10:53 PM
  #4  
My Feedback: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,688
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 27 Posts
From: Litchfield Park, AZ
Default RE: Reality setting in

Here's an easy way to do a "tapered" spar. Laminate it! This is on my Yak-11 wing which gets very thin at the tip. The spars are laminated out as far as they will go without cutting the rib completely in half and then the top lamination carries on from there. A laminated spar is very strong as well.


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.