Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Aerodynamics
Bearcat airfoil? >

Bearcat airfoil?

Community
Search
Notices
Aerodynamics Discuss the physics of flight revolving around the aerodynamics and design of aircraft.

Bearcat airfoil?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-02-2002 | 07:11 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (37)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,418
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Burbank, CA,
Default Bearcat airfoil?

I have a Jerry Bates Bearcat plans and wanted some foam cores cut for them... The problem is that its not anywhere near the actually NACA airfoil of the full size counter part. Is there a reason why it should not be the same airfoil as the full size?

In comparison, the NACA airfoil is 1/2 inch thicker than what is shown on the plans. I am sure it might even be better to get the gears in the wing.

fw190
Old 04-16-2002 | 05:15 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: San Diego, CA
Default Bearcat airfoil?

Yes, but you'd need to get into the fluid dynamics of that airfoil, the renolds numbers and the down side of scaling them.

The bottom line is that low speed aerodynamics are different. The full-scale aircraft was designed to product the desired lift, drag, and weight at a certain speed, temperature and altitude, none of which an RC plane is going to match. Generally speaking the real airfoil, on the scale planform, won't perform well in the RC arena.
I've been out of the fluid mechanics game for a while so don't dump on me if this wasn't technical enough for any readers.
Old 04-19-2002 | 03:39 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (37)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,418
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Burbank, CA,
Default airfoil

Thanks for the response, I printed out the original airfoil on the Bearcat and its at least an inch thinker than the Bates airfoil. Totally confused on which to use now. I have to check some other designers....

fw190
Old 04-19-2002 | 08:27 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Punta Gorda, FL
Default MODEL AIRFOILS

At full scale the boundary layer is very thin compared to model sizes and speeds. The boundry layer is where the flow goes from zero velocity at the airfoil surface to the full velocity of the air stream past the airfoil. As size and speed decrease, the boundry layer thickens. The energy in the flow decreases as the square of the airspeed. Because the energy in the flow over a model wing is much less, the flow does not stay attached as well and the airfoil stalls at a lower angle of attack. Because the airfoil stalls at a smaller angle of attack, the airfoil on a model can't produce as high a lift coefficient. Because the boundry layer is thicker, the model airfoil has a higher coefficient of drag.

The extra drag of a thick airfoil will require more thrust for the same performance. The delimma for the scale model flier is that it is very hard to get the model to fly at scale speed without using a non scale airfoil. What do you want? Scale outline or scale flying speed? BTW, achieving scale flying speed also requires very light weight construction because airfoils on models can't achieve as high lift coefficients as airfoils on full scale aircraft.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.