Bearcat airfoil?
#1
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (37)
I have a Jerry Bates Bearcat plans and wanted some foam cores cut for them... The problem is that its not anywhere near the actually NACA airfoil of the full size counter part. Is there a reason why it should not be the same airfoil as the full size?
In comparison, the NACA airfoil is 1/2 inch thicker than what is shown on the plans. I am sure it might even be better to get the gears in the wing.
fw190
In comparison, the NACA airfoil is 1/2 inch thicker than what is shown on the plans. I am sure it might even be better to get the gears in the wing.
fw190
#2
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: San Diego,
CA
Yes, but you'd need to get into the fluid dynamics of that airfoil, the renolds numbers and the down side of scaling them.
The bottom line is that low speed aerodynamics are different. The full-scale aircraft was designed to product the desired lift, drag, and weight at a certain speed, temperature and altitude, none of which an RC plane is going to match. Generally speaking the real airfoil, on the scale planform, won't perform well in the RC arena.
I've been out of the fluid mechanics game for a while so don't dump on me if this wasn't technical enough for any readers.
The bottom line is that low speed aerodynamics are different. The full-scale aircraft was designed to product the desired lift, drag, and weight at a certain speed, temperature and altitude, none of which an RC plane is going to match. Generally speaking the real airfoil, on the scale planform, won't perform well in the RC arena.
I've been out of the fluid mechanics game for a while so don't dump on me if this wasn't technical enough for any readers.
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Punta Gorda, FL
At full scale the boundary layer is very thin compared to model sizes and speeds. The boundry layer is where the flow goes from zero velocity at the airfoil surface to the full velocity of the air stream past the airfoil. As size and speed decrease, the boundry layer thickens. The energy in the flow decreases as the square of the airspeed. Because the energy in the flow over a model wing is much less, the flow does not stay attached as well and the airfoil stalls at a lower angle of attack. Because the airfoil stalls at a smaller angle of attack, the airfoil on a model can't produce as high a lift coefficient. Because the boundry layer is thicker, the model airfoil has a higher coefficient of drag.
The extra drag of a thick airfoil will require more thrust for the same performance. The delimma for the scale model flier is that it is very hard to get the model to fly at scale speed without using a non scale airfoil. What do you want? Scale outline or scale flying speed? BTW, achieving scale flying speed also requires very light weight construction because airfoils on models can't achieve as high lift coefficients as airfoils on full scale aircraft.
The extra drag of a thick airfoil will require more thrust for the same performance. The delimma for the scale model flier is that it is very hard to get the model to fly at scale speed without using a non scale airfoil. What do you want? Scale outline or scale flying speed? BTW, achieving scale flying speed also requires very light weight construction because airfoils on models can't achieve as high lift coefficients as airfoils on full scale aircraft.



