Another Drone Pilot does it Again
#1276
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (209)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: right here
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected]
like i say people just talk and no action i dont care about drones understand?
This is the last time I will read or notice any comments made by you, I promise.
#1277
My Feedback: (49)
Obviously you can't go around shooting at other people's property to do so could end you up in jail or maybe even shot yourself. But you have been asked several times
before to one define a drone vs another type of model aircraft and two what do you feel should be done about drones?
before to one define a drone vs another type of model aircraft and two what do you feel should be done about drones?
like i say people just talk and no action i dont care about drones understand?
Ira d: if oneaew didn't care he wouldn't be posting in a forum on DRONES. Period.
#1278
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sydney, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 4,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The FAA announced it will be developing its own app to display no fly zones in the USA.
That should clear up any ambiguity as current apps are inconsistent between themselves and real airspace dimensions.
Extract from an email received today from the FAA.
As part of its public education efforts, the FAA is developing a GPS-driven smartphone app to tell recreational unmanned aircraft operators where they can and cannot legally operate. The FAA expects to release the app for Apple devices later this year after beta testing is complete.
That should clear up any ambiguity as current apps are inconsistent between themselves and real airspace dimensions.
Extract from an email received today from the FAA.
As part of its public education efforts, the FAA is developing a GPS-driven smartphone app to tell recreational unmanned aircraft operators where they can and cannot legally operate. The FAA expects to release the app for Apple devices later this year after beta testing is complete.
Last edited by Rob2160; 05-13-2015 at 04:30 PM.
#1279
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (209)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: right here
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected]
like i say people just talk and no action i dont care about drones understand?
Ira d: if oneaew didn't care he wouldn't be posting in a forum on DRONES. Period.
like i say people just talk and no action i dont care about drones understand?
Ira d: if oneaew didn't care he wouldn't be posting in a forum on DRONES. Period.
Answer that question
He actually should go to the Boat Forum instead of the AMA forum, that way 1. we get rid of him. 2. he can complain about how high is the Water Mama. Complain about that, so he feels happy.
There they may give him a tube??????????????? or maybe not.
#1280
Originally Posted by [email protected]
like i say people just talk and no action i dont care about drones understand?
Ira d: if oneaew didn't care he wouldn't be posting in a forum on DRONES. Period.
like i say people just talk and no action i dont care about drones understand?
Ira d: if oneaew didn't care he wouldn't be posting in a forum on DRONES. Period.
#1281
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Cartersville, GA
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As part of its public education efforts, the FAA is developing a GPS-driven smartphone app to tell recreational unmanned aircraft operators where they can and cannot legally operate. The FAA expects to release the app for Apple devices later this year after beta testing is complete.
#1282
My Feedback: (49)
The FAA announced it will be developing its own app to display no fly zones in the USA.
That should clear up any ambiguity as current apps are inconsistent between themselves and real airspace dimensions.
Extract from an email received today from the FAA.
As part of its public education efforts, the FAA is developing a GPS-driven smartphone app to tell recreational unmanned aircraft operators where they can and cannot legally operate. The FAA expects to release the app for Apple devices later this year after beta testing is complete.
That should clear up any ambiguity as current apps are inconsistent between themselves and real airspace dimensions.
Extract from an email received today from the FAA.
As part of its public education efforts, the FAA is developing a GPS-driven smartphone app to tell recreational unmanned aircraft operators where they can and cannot legally operate. The FAA expects to release the app for Apple devices later this year after beta testing is complete.
The AMA better ask if they can have a say in the FAA No FLY app. There a lot of AMA fields that potentially shut down because of their proximity to airports.
#1283
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Round Hill, VA
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#1284
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DON'T SEND HIM THERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I DON'T WANT TO DEAL WITH HIM EITHER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Send him to the car/buggy forums, then he can hide in the sand under a track and no one will care. I just don't want to get my boats messed up by hitting him at racing speeds
#1285
Obviously you can't go around shooting at other people's property to do so could end you up in jail or maybe even shot yourself.
#1286
overflying your property to be even remotely in a position to legally shoot it down. But as I said few people will stand by and let you destroy their property and do nothing.
#1287
My Feedback: (49)
Jonny, Jonny, Jonny. Gimmy a break ... Of course none have been shut down ... The FAA hasn't initiated the New FAR's yet. If we leave the FAA to their own devices it will certainly be like the FAA's Interpretation of #336 no dought.
That said, We have 6 fields, that I can think of, in the Milwaukee SE Wisconsin area that are within the 5 mile radius to airports one of witch is on an airport. There are several just north of our area too. It will be interesting what the FAA does come up with. I saw another app some one else maid and the one part of the state they picked it was impossible to not be with in 5 miles of an air port for virtually a quarter of the state. Anyone know of this app?
That said, We have 6 fields, that I can think of, in the Milwaukee SE Wisconsin area that are within the 5 mile radius to airports one of witch is on an airport. There are several just north of our area too. It will be interesting what the FAA does come up with. I saw another app some one else maid and the one part of the state they picked it was impossible to not be with in 5 miles of an air port for virtually a quarter of the state. Anyone know of this app?
#1288
It facinates me that the folks who are in favor of shooting down rc aircraft never, ever think of the consequences of firing a round into the air:
http://www.arkansasmatters.com/story...0UOnsTB14Eb5KQ
http://www.odt.co.nz/news/queenstown...its-rare-plane
http://www.pe.com/articles/airport-6...ity-mejia.html
And then there's Pearl Harbor:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinio...5a7_story.html
Please, attempting to shoot ANYTHING down is not a wise solution
http://www.arkansasmatters.com/story...0UOnsTB14Eb5KQ
http://www.odt.co.nz/news/queenstown...its-rare-plane
http://www.pe.com/articles/airport-6...ity-mejia.html
And then there's Pearl Harbor:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinio...5a7_story.html
“Japanese planes did not bomb residential neighborhoods, but misfired U.S. anti-aircraft shells fell on homes and businesses,” the AP reported. “Mr. Inouye said about a half-dozen storekeepers were killed when their shops were hit.”
Official figures list 48 civilians, plus three firefighters and four federal employees, who died from the attack, mostly in Honolulu.
It is understandable that errors were made in the panic following the assault. And the number of civilian deaths was minuscule compared to the military losses. However, it’s important to set the record straight about who was responsible.
Official figures list 48 civilians, plus three firefighters and four federal employees, who died from the attack, mostly in Honolulu.
It is understandable that errors were made in the panic following the assault. And the number of civilian deaths was minuscule compared to the military losses. However, it’s important to set the record straight about who was responsible.
#1289
My Feedback: (49)
In most areas particularly in city limits just firing a gun can wind you up in jail. But be that as it may I am sure that you would have to be on your own private property with the aircraft
overflying your property to be even remotely in a position to legally shoot it down. But as I said few people will stand by and let you destroy their property and do nothing.
overflying your property to be even remotely in a position to legally shoot it down. But as I said few people will stand by and let you destroy their property and do nothing.
#1290
My Feedback: (49)
It facinates me that the folks who are in favor of shooting down rc aircraft never, ever think of the consequences of firing a round into the air:
http://www.arkansasmatters.com/story...0UOnsTB14Eb5KQ
http://www.odt.co.nz/news/queenstown...its-rare-plane
http://www.pe.com/articles/airport-6...ity-mejia.html
And then there's Pearl Harbor:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinio...5a7_story.html
Please, attempting to shoot ANYTHING down is not a wise solution
http://www.arkansasmatters.com/story...0UOnsTB14Eb5KQ
http://www.odt.co.nz/news/queenstown...its-rare-plane
http://www.pe.com/articles/airport-6...ity-mejia.html
And then there's Pearl Harbor:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinio...5a7_story.html
Please, attempting to shoot ANYTHING down is not a wise solution
But then anyone that advocates the shooting down of any aircraft ( by FAA's own definition R/C Planes Hellie's & & Quads) because they fly in the NAS are considered Aircraft, and kingmaker such statements be against some Law some place. Just making this type of statement could potentially get a person arrested, fined or maybe imprisoned. JMHO but thing do have the Potential to spiral way out of control.Sorta like some people do.
#1291
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Round Hill, VA
Posts: 1,359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jonny, Jonny, Jonny. Gimmy a break ... Of course none have been shut down ... The FAA hasn't initiated the New FAR's yet. If we leave the FAA to their own devices it will certainly be like the FAA's Interpretation of #336 no dought.
That said, We have 6 fields, that I can think of, in the Milwaukee SE Wisconsin area that are within the 5 mile radius to airports one of witch is on an airport. There are several just north of our area too. It will be interesting what the FAA does come up with. I saw another app some one else maid and the one part of the state they picked it was impossible to not be with in 5 miles of an air port for virtually a quarter of the state. Anyone know of this app?
That said, We have 6 fields, that I can think of, in the Milwaukee SE Wisconsin area that are within the 5 mile radius to airports one of witch is on an airport. There are several just north of our area too. It will be interesting what the FAA does come up with. I saw another app some one else maid and the one part of the state they picked it was impossible to not be with in 5 miles of an air port for virtually a quarter of the state. Anyone know of this app?
#1292
In most areas particularly in city limits just firing a gun
#1293
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sydney, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 4,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Last edited by Rob2160; 05-14-2015 at 08:56 AM.
#1294
It facinates me that the folks who are in favor of shooting down rc aircraft never, ever think of the consequences of firing a round into the air:
http://www.arkansasmatters.com/story...0UOnsTB14Eb5KQ
http://www.odt.co.nz/news/queenstown...its-rare-plane
http://www.pe.com/articles/airport-6...ity-mejia.html
And then there's Pearl Harbor:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinio...5a7_story.html
Please, attempting to shoot ANYTHING down is not a wise solution
http://www.arkansasmatters.com/story...0UOnsTB14Eb5KQ
http://www.odt.co.nz/news/queenstown...its-rare-plane
http://www.pe.com/articles/airport-6...ity-mejia.html
And then there's Pearl Harbor:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinio...5a7_story.html
Please, attempting to shoot ANYTHING down is not a wise solution
#1296
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sydney, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 4,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not so good if you are a commercial operator with approval to fly near an airport… Also from what I have seen some major airports are missing from he Database.
#1297
If a club flying field has been operating within 5 miles of an airport with no problems, I doubt that the airport could legitimately object to the field under the new law. The AMA is providing a resource to help flying fields to establish relationships with airports under the new law. I expect that the number of fields at risk of closure is closer to zero that you think.
attributively have such a right but instead have to show a good reason to stop any nearby RC activity. However if the FAA gets it's way a lot of airports could see stopping RC
flying that is close to them as a way to limit liability in the event of a incident involving a RC craft.
#1298
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Cartersville, GA
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another idiot just flew a "drone or model airplane" over the fence at the White House, about an hour ago. Secret service has detained the pilot. More to come, I am sure.
Man detained outside White House for trying to fly drone
Man detained outside White House for trying to fly drone
Last edited by N410DC; 05-14-2015 at 11:29 AM.
#1299
Most areas of this country are urban areas where it is legal to fire a gun. Even in city limits many areas allow you to fire your gun to protect property if no one is armed, only target practice and celebrations are outlawed. And some areas you get fined or even jailed for shooting a burglar.
in many areas especially in Calif many cities have laws on the books that you can't fire a gun inside their limits which is a catch all if they cannot get you on anything else.
When you think about it from a common sense point of view there is no reason to have such laws but I can see a need to have laws against reckless or unsafe firearm discharge.
#1300
My Feedback: (36)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ontario, CA
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This one will probably go to jail while the other one was a Gov. (CIA) employee and got his wrist slapped.... SMH...