Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > AMA Discussions
Reload this Page >

Are you ready to register your aircraft?

Community
Search
Notices
AMA Discussions Discuss AMA policies, decisions & any other AMA related topics here.

Are you ready to register your aircraft?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2015, 05:44 PM
  #851  
HoundDog
My Feedback: (49)
 
HoundDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Apache Junction AZ. WI 0WI8
Posts: 4,501
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by rgburrill
Just to let you know the director has already said there should be NO FEE for registering hobby aircraft. So shove that in your pipe hole.
Now that's a real adult statement Thank U
After a statement like that Take a look at post #842 It seems to fit U well.
Old 11-03-2015, 06:05 PM
  #852  
rcmiket
 
rcmiket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 5,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Granpooba
Man, I sure am happy to be living in NY state. Hate to be living in Texas and have to join that El Paso group ! Hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
We have a great time here. No winters and the best part is no state income tax.That's two of the biggest reasons I left N.Y.
Me and Crispy ( or whatever his real name is) have and thing going on he says it's black and I say it's white. About the only thing we agree upon is .......... well nothing.
Mike

Last edited by rcmiket; 11-03-2015 at 06:10 PM.
Old 11-03-2015, 08:17 PM
  #853  
Chris P. Bacon
Banned
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rcmiket
Nobody does anything voluntarily.

You're posting here right?

Let me simplify this for you. Anyone who's following the rules now will never encounter a problem later.

Cool so accidents don't happen, who knew.

As a matter of fact I support them.

You support breaking the law?

As far as the DOT who knows what they'll come up with. One things for sure they'll create a bureaucratic nightmare that will spin out of control as all government deals do. Enforcement will be a joke.

The joke will be on those paying the fines. I'd venture a guess that any laws requiring registration become part of the AMA safety code. As we know today, the safety code is enforceable by CDs at events. Perhaps that means that CDs can enforce the registration requirements (whatever they may be).

Now please feel free to be the first in line to register stuff you have owned for years.

I will and have no problem registering my stuff. I've already held a federal license for the past 22+ years. IMHO registration will only add legitimacy this hobby has never had. Many hear have complained repeatedly about rogue drone operators. The best way for us to differentiate ourselves from the rouge drone operators is to set an example by complying with the law. Failure to comply only makes you one of them.

Mike
Above in red.
Old 11-03-2015, 08:55 PM
  #854  
Sport_Pilot
 
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 16,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by rgburrill
Just to let you know the director has already said there should be NO FEE for registering hobby aircraft. So shove that in your pipe hole.

I don't think anyone here cares about cost. They care about the FAA man coming to the field for a registration check!
Old 11-03-2015, 08:57 PM
  #855  
Sport_Pilot
 
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 16,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Chris P. Bacon
If registration is required and someone is caught w/o registration then they suffer the consequences (fine, etc.).

I think that is the problem!
Old 11-03-2015, 09:02 PM
  #856  
franklin_m
 
franklin_m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 4,561
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Chris P. Bacon
As we know today, the safety code is enforceable by CDs at events. Perhaps that means that CDs can enforce the registration requirements (whatever they may be). .... The best way for us to differentiate ourselves from the rouge drone operators is to set an example by complying with the law. Failure to comply only makes you one of them.
Those are both welcome comments, but I have a hard time seeing enforcement by AMA when they won't even list the names of turbine holders who've had their waiver revoked? Part of a meaningful safety program is looking at trends, and I'm sure a CD would put mitigations in place if he knew someone had their waiver revoked before. Some will say "but the jet guys will know." Ok, that may be true, but people's behavior (i.e. flight discipline) changes when they know their actions will land their name on a list that stays forever.

I would love to see the AMA enforce more than it does, as I agree it would add much needed legitimacy to their claims that they have a safety management system. I just don't see them doing it -- not in the organizational culture.
Old 11-04-2015, 05:24 AM
  #857  
Lamoilleriver
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: northern, VT
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No FEE to register model aircraft, how long will that last? There is no such thing as free registration, somewhere your tax dollars are being lifted out of one your pockets and paying someone to be on the receiving end and enter this information into the system. TINSTAAFL If accidents happens, politicians will use FEES to limit the number of model aircraft available, make them too expensive to own.
Old 11-04-2015, 05:42 AM
  #858  
rcmiket
 
rcmiket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 5,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

"Originally Posted by Chris P. Bacon As we know today, the safety code is enforceable by CDs at events. Perhaps that means that CDs can enforce the registration requirements (whatever they may be). .... The best way for us to differentiate ourselves from the rouge drone operators is to set an example by complying with the law. Failure to comply only makes you one of them."

A Contest Director runs a event not the day to day operation of the field. Do you really think rouge drone operators will be showing up at the local flying field?

Mike



Last edited by rcmiket; 11-04-2015 at 05:50 AM.
Old 11-04-2015, 05:52 AM
  #859  
Chris P. Bacon
Banned
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rcmiket
"Originally Posted by Chris P. Bacon As we know today, the safety code is enforceable by CDs at events. Perhaps that means that CDs can enforce the registration requirements (whatever they may be). .... The best way for us to differentiate ourselves from the rouge drone operators is to set an example by complying with the law. Failure to comply only makes you one of them."

A Contest Director runs a event not the day to day operation of the field. Do you really think rouge drone operators will be showing up at the local flying field?

Mike


I never said CDs run day to day operations. I wasn't referring to rouge done operators either. I was specifically referring to event participants who fail to comply with FAA registration requirements once they're implemented.

Last edited by Chris P. Bacon; 11-04-2015 at 05:58 AM.
Old 11-04-2015, 05:55 AM
  #860  
rcmiket
 
rcmiket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 5,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Chris P. Bacon posted
"You support breaking the law? "

If they are flying observing the AMA safety guidelines how would they be breaking the law? I specifically said "Anyone who's following the rules now will never encounter a problem later."

Mike


Old 11-04-2015, 05:56 AM
  #861  
rcmiket
 
rcmiket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 5,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris P. Bacon
I never said CDs runs day to day operations. I wasn't referring to rouge done operators either. I was specifically referring to event participants who fail to comply with FAA registration requirements once they're implemented.
Sure you did.............................

Mike
Old 11-04-2015, 06:02 AM
  #862  
Chris P. Bacon
Banned
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rcmiket
Chris P. Bacon posted
"You support breaking the law? "

If they are flying observing the AMA safety guidelines how would they be breaking the law? I specifically said "Anyone who's following the rules now will never encounter a problem later."

Mike


The AMA Safety Code is not a guideline, it's a requirement for AMA members. You agreed to it when you signed your AMA membership application. The AMA SC isn't law either. However, the way I see it, FAA registration will become law.
Old 11-04-2015, 06:02 AM
  #863  
Chris P. Bacon
Banned
My Feedback: (4)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rcmiket
Sure you did.............................

Mike
Sure Mikey, whatever you say.
Old 11-04-2015, 06:03 AM
  #864  
Sport_Pilot
 
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 16,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Chris P. Bacon
I never said CDs run day to day operations. I wasn't referring to rouge done operators either. I was specifically referring to event participants who fail to comply with FAA registration requirements once they're implemented.
So we can agree that it is not likely that rouge operators will be using the field. So then why should we care to enforce this?, Except perhaps for fields near airports.

IMO its the FAA's requirement, so their mess, the AMA should not put themselves in a position where the FAA blames them for enforcement.
Old 11-04-2015, 06:04 AM
  #865  
Sport_Pilot
 
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 16,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by rcmiket
Chris P. Bacon posted
"You support breaking the law? "

If they are flying observing the AMA safety guidelines how would they be breaking the law? I specifically said "Anyone who's following the rules now will never encounter a problem later."

Mike


A very good point! But one that likely will not be decided without a law suit.

Last edited by Sport_Pilot; 11-04-2015 at 06:44 AM.
Old 11-04-2015, 06:40 AM
  #866  
[email protected]
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: hemet , CA
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

to hll with all the laws
Old 11-04-2015, 07:00 AM
  #867  
rcmiket
 
rcmiket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 5,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sport_Pilot
A very good point! But one that likely will not be decided without a law suit.
That's just really sad isn't it? The hobby has survived all this time with very few issues and now it's come down to the courts. There's something wrong there.

MIke
Old 11-04-2015, 08:14 AM
  #868  
HoundDog
My Feedback: (49)
 
HoundDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Apache Junction AZ. WI 0WI8
Posts: 4,501
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by rcmiket
"Originally Posted by Chris P. Bacon As we know today, the safety code is enforceable by CDs at events. Perhaps that means that CDs can enforce the registration requirements (whatever they may be). .... The best way for us to differentiate ourselves from the rouge drone operators is to set an example by complying with the law. Failure to comply only makes you one of them."

A Contest Director runs a event not the day to day operation of the field. Do you really think rouge drone operators will be showing up at the local flying field?

Mike


If U look at the AMA CONTEST DIRECTORS GUIDE. I believe that,CD's are required to Enforce the Safety rules no mater what.
From:
http://www.modelaircraft.org/files/A...de_3-20-15.pdf

A CD is responsible to see that all safety rules and precautions are followed to the letter. Any CDwho knowingly allows an unsafe condition to exist is subject to the loss of his/her CD status.

Old 11-04-2015, 08:36 AM
  #869  
combatpigg
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
combatpigg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: arlington, WA
Posts: 20,388
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

[QUOTE/] I will and have no problem registering my stuff. I've already held a federal license for the past 22+ years. IMHO registration will only add legitimacy this hobby has never had. Many hear have complained repeatedly about rogue drone operators. The best way for us to differentiate ourselves from the rouge drone operators is to set an example by complying with the law. Failure to comply only makes you one of them.

I will and have no problem registering my stuff. I've already held a federal license for the past 22+ years. IMHO registration will only add legitimacy this hobby has never had. Many hear have complained repeatedly about rogue drone operators. The best way for us to differentiate ourselves from the rouge drone operators is to set an example by complying with the law. Failure to comply only makes you one of them.
[/QUOTE]

Wow.
Of course the FPV advocates do not care how many hoops they have to jump through in order to "legitimize" what they do.
Not only are they willing to do / spend whatever it takes to legitimize their activity but they are also more than willing to see sanctions heaped upon Traditional Radio Control Flyers too.
Whatever it takes to be able to fly with their Space Cowboy Goggles....huh...?
Old 11-04-2015, 09:02 AM
  #870  
rcmiket
 
rcmiket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 5,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HoundDog
If U look at the AMA CONTEST DIRECTORS GUIDE. I believe that,CD's are required to Enforce the Safety rules no mater what.
From:
http://www.modelaircraft.org/files/A...de_3-20-15.pdf

A CD is responsible to see that all safety rules and precautions are followed to the letter. Any CDwho knowingly allows an unsafe condition to exist is subject to the loss of his/her CD status.

Enforce safety rules yes. I agree with that. Inspect aircraft for registration no.
A AMA officer has no authority under the law to enforce anything other than the safety rules,
If any individual is abiding by the current safety rules why would any CD interfere?

Mike

Last edited by rcmiket; 11-04-2015 at 09:16 AM.
Old 11-04-2015, 09:23 AM
  #871  
HoundDog
My Feedback: (49)
 
HoundDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Apache Junction AZ. WI 0WI8
Posts: 4,501
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by combatpigg
[QUOTE/] I will and have no problem registering my stuff. I've already held a federal license for the past 22+ years. IMHO registration will only add legitimacy this hobby has never had. Many hear have complained repeatedly about rogue drone operators. The best way for us to differentiate ourselves from the rouge drone operators is to set an example by complying with the law. Failure to comply only makes you one of them.

I will and have no problem registering my stuff. I've already held a federal license for the past 22+ years. IMHO registration will only add legitimacy this hobby has never had. Many hear have complained repeatedly about rogue drone operators. The best way for us to differentiate ourselves from the rouge drone operators is to set an example by complying with the law. Failure to comply only makes you one of them.
Wow.
Of course the FPV advocates do not care how many hoops they have to jump through in order to "legitimize" what they do.
Not only are they willing to do / spend whatever it takes to legitimize their activity but they are also more than willing to see sanctions heaped upon Traditional Radio Control Flyers too.
Whatever it takes to be able to fly with their Space Cowboy Goggles....huh...?
[/QUOTE]
Piggy:

Sorry but I had a big 4 paragraph rebuttal and the Stupid thing ate it.

Just the same U R Wrong Period.
Old 11-04-2015, 09:27 AM
  #872  
astrohog
My Feedback: (1)
 
astrohog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 3,345
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by combatpigg
[QUOTE/] I will and have no problem registering my stuff. I've already held a federal license for the past 22+ years. IMHO registration will only add legitimacy this hobby has never had. Many hear have complained repeatedly about rogue drone operators. The best way for us to differentiate ourselves from the rouge drone operators is to set an example by complying with the law. Failure to comply only makes you one of them.

I will and have no problem registering my stuff. I've already held a federal license for the past 22+ years. IMHO registration will only add legitimacy this hobby has never had. Many hear have complained repeatedly about rogue drone operators. The best way for us to differentiate ourselves from the rouge drone operators is to set an example by complying with the law. Failure to comply only makes you one of them.
Wow.
Of course the FPV advocates do not care how many hoops they have to jump through in order to "legitimize" what they do.
Not only are they willing to do / spend whatever it takes to legitimize their activity but they are also more than willing to see sanctions heaped upon Traditional Radio Control Flyers too.
Whatever it takes to be able to fly with their Space Cowboy Goggles....huh...?[/QUOTE]
Nicely said!!

Astro
Old 11-04-2015, 09:30 AM
  #873  
Sport_Pilot
 
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 16,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by combatpigg
[QUOTE/] I will and have no problem registering my stuff. I've already held a federal license for the past 22+ years. IMHO registration will only add legitimacy this hobby has never had. Many hear have complained repeatedly about rogue drone operators. The best way for us to differentiate ourselves from the rouge drone operators is to set an example by complying with the law. Failure to comply only makes you one of them.

I will and have no problem registering my stuff. I've already held a federal license for the past 22+ years. IMHO registration will only add legitimacy this hobby has never had. Many hear have complained repeatedly about rogue drone operators. The best way for us to differentiate ourselves from the rouge drone operators is to set an example by complying with the law. Failure to comply only makes you one of them.
Wow.
Of course the FPV advocates do not care how many hoops they have to jump through in order to "legitimize" what they do.
Not only are they willing to do / spend whatever it takes to legitimize their activity but they are also more than willing to see sanctions heaped upon Traditional Radio Control Flyers too.
Whatever it takes to be able to fly with their Space Cowboy Goggles....huh...?
Who were you quoting? I can't find it. I did not know we had an illigimate hobby that needed registration to add legitimacy. Seems to me it is perfectly legal and registration leads down the road to illegitimacy. Not the other way around.

Last edited by Sport_Pilot; 11-04-2015 at 09:35 AM.
Old 11-04-2015, 09:31 AM
  #874  
Sport_Pilot
 
Sport_Pilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Acworth, GA
Posts: 16,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Sorry Dupe post.

Last edited by Sport_Pilot; 11-04-2015 at 09:34 AM.
Old 11-04-2015, 09:32 AM
  #875  
oliveDrab
 
oliveDrab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Georgetown, KY
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

After observing how this thread has degenerated, the advertisements that pop up are starting to look really interesting.


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.