this is why...
#26
Hi Sport ,
I'm sorry that my computer skills would make a 5th grader laugh , and I have no answer for your question . I did want to comment on what I read in the story in the link you provided though . Did you notice where it was estimated that about a Drone a month is being shot down here in the US ? If that stat is true , I'm truly amazed there has not been more TV news coverage of the fact that drone shooting is becoming as popular a pastime as Skeet shooting is ! A drone a month and my local news has reported on that I know of just one or two drone shoot down stories ? It seems at such a rate as 1 per month this would be a far bigger news story than which Kardashian has broken up with which boyfriend , of which we're treated to almost nightly coverage of ?
I'm sorry that my computer skills would make a 5th grader laugh , and I have no answer for your question . I did want to comment on what I read in the story in the link you provided though . Did you notice where it was estimated that about a Drone a month is being shot down here in the US ? If that stat is true , I'm truly amazed there has not been more TV news coverage of the fact that drone shooting is becoming as popular a pastime as Skeet shooting is ! A drone a month and my local news has reported on that I know of just one or two drone shoot down stories ? It seems at such a rate as 1 per month this would be a far bigger news story than which Kardashian has broken up with which boyfriend , of which we're treated to almost nightly coverage of ?
Hmm, gives me an idea. How bout drone skeet?
#27
#28
Hi Tim ,
Oh Hell ya , for someone rich enough to pay for remote controlled clay pigeons of any sort and has the big wide open safe area to shoot em , I think that'd literally be a blast and I'd even pay to do it as a "theme park" experience were I rich enough !
But the thing Sport's story was talking about I think is the possibility of one a month being taken down by other than the gent paying for it and if that's indeed true it's a kinda troubling stat indeed . Does this mean that there are so many already being flown over folk's property that folks feel they have the right to be blasting it outta the sky no matter it's mission ? Oh sure show me one hovering outside anybody's window and that drone is fair game to be blasted , as far as I'm concerned . But I guess the real question is , is there really one drone a month peepin in someone's windows , or are folks becoming accustomed to "it's a drone , it must be spying on ME , therefor it must be destroyed" thinking ?
Oh Hell ya , for someone rich enough to pay for remote controlled clay pigeons of any sort and has the big wide open safe area to shoot em , I think that'd literally be a blast and I'd even pay to do it as a "theme park" experience were I rich enough !
But the thing Sport's story was talking about I think is the possibility of one a month being taken down by other than the gent paying for it and if that's indeed true it's a kinda troubling stat indeed . Does this mean that there are so many already being flown over folk's property that folks feel they have the right to be blasting it outta the sky no matter it's mission ? Oh sure show me one hovering outside anybody's window and that drone is fair game to be blasted , as far as I'm concerned . But I guess the real question is , is there really one drone a month peepin in someone's windows , or are folks becoming accustomed to "it's a drone , it must be spying on ME , therefor it must be destroyed" thinking ?
#30
Hi Tim ,
Oh Hell ya , for someone rich enough to pay for remote controlled clay pigeons of any sort and has the big wide open safe area to shoot em , I think that'd literally be a blast and I'd even pay to do it as a "theme park" experience were I rich enough !
But the thing Sport's story was talking about I think is the possibility of one a month being taken down by other than the gent paying for it and if that's indeed true it's a kinda troubling stat indeed . Does this mean that there are so many already being flown over folk's property that folks feel they have the right to be blasting it outta the sky no matter it's mission ? Oh sure show me one hovering outside anybody's window and that drone is fair game to be blasted , as far as I'm concerned . But I guess the real question is , is there really one drone a month peepin in someone's windows , or are folks becoming accustomed to "it's a drone , it must be spying on ME , therefor it must be destroyed" thinking ?
Oh Hell ya , for someone rich enough to pay for remote controlled clay pigeons of any sort and has the big wide open safe area to shoot em , I think that'd literally be a blast and I'd even pay to do it as a "theme park" experience were I rich enough !
But the thing Sport's story was talking about I think is the possibility of one a month being taken down by other than the gent paying for it and if that's indeed true it's a kinda troubling stat indeed . Does this mean that there are so many already being flown over folk's property that folks feel they have the right to be blasting it outta the sky no matter it's mission ? Oh sure show me one hovering outside anybody's window and that drone is fair game to be blasted , as far as I'm concerned . But I guess the real question is , is there really one drone a month peepin in someone's windows , or are folks becoming accustomed to "it's a drone , it must be spying on ME , therefor it must be destroyed" thinking ?
The point of the story is that if ruled in favour of the defendant then it will be perfectly legal to blast them when over your property. At least when in rural areas with no firearm discharge law. So if so then maybe a whole lot more than one a month will be shot.
#32
#33
+1