WHAT PLANE??
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Calhoun,
LA
I have to go with the 4*, very good second plane. I'm building the somethin extra as my second, but I think the 4* is more docile and easier to land. Just MY $.02
#7

My Feedback: (68)
ORIGINAL: AirGar
Don't forget the Hobbico BrightStar....A low wing, flat bottom that flies great with a 46 or a 61. Or, pick yourself up about any Mfg's 40 size Stick.
Gary
Don't forget the Hobbico BrightStar....A low wing, flat bottom that flies great with a 46 or a 61. Or, pick yourself up about any Mfg's 40 size Stick.
Gary
I agree with Gary on the BriteStar from Hobbico. Its a very fun plane. My friend has one as a sunday lazy flier and I have the older version the SkyVista. Both are fun and easy to fly. Shame both are discontinued [
]. If you see one at your LHS pick one up.If not avilable try the 4Star from Sig. Good choice
#14
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Suffolk, VA,
anybody waht makes a good engine. the rpm, the size, the weight, etc.?
and for this airplane waht would be a good choice? this plane is pretty light so it has good potential I think.
and for this airplane waht would be a good choice? this plane is pretty light so it has good potential I think.
#15

My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Hawthorne, CA
World Models T-34 with an OS 46FX is an excellent combo for your second plane. You can use all the supplied hardware, it has an excellent low wing, can be propped for speed or aerobatics, comes with a nice cowl, I could go on.
The OS is a really well made engine just don't lean it out to much.
Magnums are crap, plane and simple. Four stars are nice but no sheeting on the wing seems a bit cheap to me and I think it's just a bit dated in it's design.
For $130 and no need to buy a bunch of replacement hardware the T-34 is hard to beat.
The OS is a really well made engine just don't lean it out to much.
Magnums are crap, plane and simple. Four stars are nice but no sheeting on the wing seems a bit cheap to me and I think it's just a bit dated in it's design.
For $130 and no need to buy a bunch of replacement hardware the T-34 is hard to beat.
#18

My Feedback: (41)
ORIGINAL: skate5290
my question is still not answered will the maintenance be the same on a 4 stroke and 2 stroke?
my question is still not answered will the maintenance be the same on a 4 stroke and 2 stroke?
#20
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: McLean,
VA
I vote for the World Models super stunts 40 size, which is currently one of my favorite airplanes and comes with me to the field every time I go. Available at www.airborne-models.com. Here are some of the things I like about it:
It's an arf for only $99 with ultracote covering. I put it together very quickly.
It's bigger than the ultra stick 40 (it has a 66" wingspan), but cheaper.
It's lightweight for its size (it flies beautifully with an os 46 fx). I can get almost the same vertical performance out of this plane as one of the guys at my field gets on his ultra stick 40 with a 90 size saito four-stroke. It's sized like the ultra stick 60, but is significantly lighter.
It's a tricycle gear (good for new flyers), but can readily be converted to a taildragger (i did this with mine).
It takes off, flies, and lands absolutely wonderfully. IMHO, this plane is much easier to fly than my tower trainer 40 or my friend's avistar. It basically will not stall.
Some of the other things to consider:
Leading edges are not sheeted.
Doesn't come with extra servo slots installed and extra parts for using four wing servos, though it can be modified for this.
Comes as a tricycle gear, not a taildragger.
It includes metric hardware, which is a pain if everything else you have is standard.
It's an arf for only $99 with ultracote covering. I put it together very quickly.
It's bigger than the ultra stick 40 (it has a 66" wingspan), but cheaper.
It's lightweight for its size (it flies beautifully with an os 46 fx). I can get almost the same vertical performance out of this plane as one of the guys at my field gets on his ultra stick 40 with a 90 size saito four-stroke. It's sized like the ultra stick 60, but is significantly lighter.
It's a tricycle gear (good for new flyers), but can readily be converted to a taildragger (i did this with mine).
It takes off, flies, and lands absolutely wonderfully. IMHO, this plane is much easier to fly than my tower trainer 40 or my friend's avistar. It basically will not stall.
Some of the other things to consider:
Leading edges are not sheeted.
Doesn't come with extra servo slots installed and extra parts for using four wing servos, though it can be modified for this.
Comes as a tricycle gear, not a taildragger.
It includes metric hardware, which is a pain if everything else you have is standard.
#21

My Feedback: (35)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: West Monroe,
LA
ORIGINAL: skate5290
my question is still not answered will the maintenance be the same on a 4 stroke and 2 stroke?
my question is still not answered will the maintenance be the same on a 4 stroke and 2 stroke?
John
#22
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Suffolk, VA,
so waht are the pros of having a 4 stroke over a 2 stroke?
are they both equally strong or what? etc.
and what are some good brand names of each that u guys would recommend?
thanx
are they both equally strong or what? etc.
and what are some good brand names of each that u guys would recommend?
thanx
#25
Senior Member
My Feedback: (197)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Minnetonka,
MN
Some differences between 4-Stroke and 2-Stroke Engines:
4-strokes are quieter
4-strokes get better fuel economy
2-strokes generate more RPM (11,000-13,000 rpm with prop
while 4-strokes rev to around 9,500 rpm)
4-strokes generate much more torque and will swing a larger prop.
4-strokes have a realistic sound similar to a real airplane engine.
(The sound of the engine is lower in pitch than a 2-stroke)
4-strokes are quieter
4-strokes get better fuel economy
2-strokes generate more RPM (11,000-13,000 rpm with prop
while 4-strokes rev to around 9,500 rpm)
4-strokes generate much more torque and will swing a larger prop.
4-strokes have a realistic sound similar to a real airplane engine.
(The sound of the engine is lower in pitch than a 2-stroke)


