Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > ARF or RTF
Magic question >

Magic question

Community
Search
Notices
ARF or RTF Discuss ARF (Almost Ready to Fly) radio control airplanes here.

Magic question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-2002 | 02:42 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Gentry, AR
Default Magic question

I have a Magic on its way & I'm wondering what to put on it for power. I was going to use a TT 36 pro, & make the plane as light as possible. I have a Saito 72 I could use, has anyone used this motor on one before? Thanks for your advice.
Old 06-24-2002 | 10:14 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Just behind Walmart
Default Magic question

You have the magic question and I believe I have the magic answer........Saito 100..........Have one on mine and never been happier...........Not bad considering it isn't a bi-plane but nothing is perfect.
Old 06-24-2002 | 10:55 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tampa, FL
Default Magic question

Checking all magic posts the os 32 seems the most lightest yet powerful enough to hover well.

A many also use os 46 and like it. Saw a 46 fly yesterday still landed in about 18 inch roll! at most! and it did seem to fly lite but the builder said he had hell getting the cog back with the weight of the 46.

Some use the 36 and like it.

I want lightest and powerful, so its os 32 for me soon.

Dennis
Old 06-26-2002 | 07:53 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Portland, OR
Default Magic question

I just flew my magic yesterday after putting a new tt .36 pro on. Was a perfect match. Just breaking into two cycle and with a 9x6 prop it had unlimited vertical. I can't wait to see what it does when it is broken in and has a 10/4 or 11/3 on it. I had a OS 46 LA and was unhappy. Throttle response was terrible. The tt 36 was a major improvement. I hope this helps.
Old 06-26-2002 | 10:02 PM
  #5  
Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From:
Default Magic question

I think a 72 would be great on this plane, considering it weighs the same as a os fx 46. Im just flying a saito 56 on mine , and its got plenty thrust to hover. If this thing just had some rudder below the thrusts line it would be a great plane. I still like mine very much. There is no earthly need for .91s and 100s on a four pound plane. This plane has great elevator authority, perhaps the added thrust of the 72 would help throttle blip the rudder around and make up for its weakness in hover. All in all, a great deal for a c-note, that magic is. I just wish they had the elevator pull wires offset, so i could run a joiner wire down and add about half the rudders surface area to the underside of the plane...... have fun with it!!!
Old 06-27-2002 | 12:32 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: New Holland, PA
Default Magic question

I would go for the OS32SX or the TT 36 Pro for sure. I had one about 6 months ago and regret selling it. I had a Webra 32 on it and it would pull out of a hover with authority and was LIGHT!

I think Cliff Griffin has his at 3.25 pounds with a T36 on his and he LOVES it. It really depends on your flying style, I like em light. The plane hovers great. My buddy has one with an OS 46FX on it and it hovers at 1/3 throttle.

Look for a review in next month's RCUniverse Magazine
Old 06-27-2002 | 06:32 AM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Gentry, AR
Default Magic question

Thanks a lot guys, I think I'll use the 36 pro.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.