Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > ARF or RTF
 Vector Flight Extra Engine Choice >

Vector Flight Extra Engine Choice

Community
Search
Notices
ARF or RTF Discuss ARF (Almost Ready to Fly) radio control airplanes here.

Vector Flight Extra Engine Choice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-2004 | 06:49 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Maumee, OH
Default Vector Flight Extra Engine Choice

I am having some problems deciding on an engine for my VF 66" Extra. I have a Saito 100 but that will most likely go on a different plane. Seeing that I am not going to use this for 3D, I would prefer a 2 stroke since that is what I am most comfortable with. I really like Irvine 2 strokes, but the problem is that they go from a 72 (I want something larger), to a 1.50. Now I am assuming the 1.50 is to much - or is it? I searched here, but only found a couple posts about more than a 1.00 in these planes. Is this 1.50 to much? Any other suggestions (other than OS)?
Old 04-25-2004 | 07:55 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (40)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Merrimack, NH
Default RE: Vector Flight Extra Engine Choice

1.50 is too heavy for the VF 66" Extra. Adequate power would be a .91 2-stroke, like the OS91FX (some love 'em, some hate 'em) or the Magnum .91 XLS (mine has great power with Jett Engineering in-cowl muffler, shimmed head and 25-30% nitro). A little extra power for good vertical authority would be a 1.20 2-stroke (Magnum again, or GMS, and there are others).
Old 04-25-2004 | 08:15 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Maumee, OH
Default RE: Vector Flight Extra Engine Choice

Funny you mention Jett. They have a 90 and 1.05. You mentioned their in cowl muffler. How does that fit?
Old 04-25-2004 | 11:11 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (40)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Merrimack, NH
Default RE: Vector Flight Extra Engine Choice

Jett in-cowl muffler is basically cylinder shaped, ~3" diameter, 2" height, one exhaust outlet extends another 1" straight out the face opposite the engine. Attachment is by the normal two screws, and the adapter is on the perimeter of the flat face of the cylinder. The opposite face is rounded at the perimeter, sorta bowl-shaped. If you side-mount the engine, the muffler hangs down below, exhaust outlet points out the bottom. There's just about enough clearance beween engine and muffler to run the pushrod up to the throttle arm. Very compact arrangement. There is a baffle inside there, whose arrangement is mysterious to me. Weight is 7.0 oz, a couple oz heavier than a BCM Pitts. Never got around to taching Jett vs standard muffler, but the power boost is significant.

I've always considered their engines too pricey for my taste. I usually think YS when I want high performance.

I looked at the Hobby People website and see the Magnum .91 XLS has been discounted from what I paid. This engine deserves more notice than it gets.
Old 04-25-2004 | 11:17 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (39)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tucson, AZ
Default RE: Vector Flight Extra Engine Choice

Check out the ST 90 it is a great engine and other posters in the VF thread have had good luck with them in the extra. I fly mine with a TT 91 4 stroke in it and it is a great flying plane. I have also used an ASP/Magnum 91 4 stroke in it also. Both engines flew the plane fine but I like the TT engine because it has a little more power.

Rick
Old 04-26-2004 | 06:24 AM
  #6  
Ross Kean's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Fredericton, NB, CANADA
Default RE: Vector Flight Extra Engine Choice

I just ordered a Saito 100 for mine, my first four stroke. I thought about a 90-ish two stroke but didn't want the muffler hanging out and the 4S sound is just too cool. A smoke system may be a future addition and the 4S is a better choice for that. Looking forward to flying it. Its a great plane for the $$$.
Old 04-26-2004 | 07:26 AM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Maumee, OH
Default RE: Vector Flight Extra Engine Choice

Thanks everyone. I just heard back from VF customer service who said a 100 2 stroke was way to much and would put unnecessary stresses on the airframe. Looks like I will go with the Jett 90.
Old 04-26-2004 | 06:54 PM
  #8  
Ross Kean's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Fredericton, NB, CANADA
Default RE: Vector Flight Extra Engine Choice

I think a Jett 90 will provide somewhat more stress on the airframe than the average 100 2S engine!!!

Ross
Old 04-26-2004 | 06:56 PM
  #9  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Maumee, OH
Default RE: Vector Flight Extra Engine Choice

Yeah. After more thought, I will most likely end up with a Saito 100.
Old 04-26-2004 | 10:53 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Salmon ArmBritish Columbia, CANADA
Default RE: Vector Flight Extra Engine Choice

I have an MVVS .91 on mine (naturally). Works very will with a 15x8 and a BCM Pitts.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.