Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > ARF or RTF
 Need opinions on two low wing arfs >

Need opinions on two low wing arfs

Community
Search
Notices
ARF or RTF Discuss ARF (Almost Ready to Fly) radio control airplanes here.

Need opinions on two low wing arfs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2004 | 02:50 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Crestwood, KY
Default Need opinions on two low wing arfs

Hello all:
I am considering purchasing a low wing aircraft as a second airplane to fly. I've owned a Goldberg Cub, Great Planes Sportster 40 and really didn't feel competent to fly these airplanes. I am getting fairly decent with the my trainer. Deadstick landings are not big deal and touch and goes, well I am getting the hang of those as well.

Here's what I am looking at. I am like the Goldberg Tiger 2 ARF and Sig Four Star 40. Which flys better? Which is the better value for the money? Which one is easier to maintain?

Thank
John
Old 05-07-2004 | 04:08 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Weirton, WV
Default RE: Need opinions on two low arfs

Both are EXCELLENT airplanes. I have both, and I love them....as far as which one flies better.....well.......I can't say! The tiger 2 is a heavier plane, so it requires a good, ball-bearing .46-.51 engine to get the best of it......the Four Star is lighter (at least the kit-built one, which I have, is lighter), so a lower-cost bushing .46 might fly it well. (I would still recommend a ball-bearing .46 for it).

The four star is a taildragger....and the Tiger 2 is a trike gear, with the option to change it to a taildragger, so the Four Star will take a little more effort on the ground.

The Tiger 2 definitely handles wind better....in fact, the Tiger 2 and my Ultra Stick .40 are the planes I prefer to fly on windy days.

The Four Star is a real floater, and flies very "lightly" with a Ball Bearing .46

Like I said.....I can't tell you which flies better.....I don't think there is an answer to that question.....but these are the major differences that I've noticed.
Old 05-10-2004 | 02:52 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Silverdale WA
Default RE: Need opinions on two low arfs

From everything I have read and seen, the Tiger II is an excellent cross over plane and is an excellent flyer. I have
a tiger 60 (actually 2 of them) that I am just finishing up building, and all of our club members to a person say that
with the goldberg tiger II or tiger 60 you cannot go wrong. Great flyers, etc.

IMHO i would go with the tiger II.
Old 05-10-2004 | 04:48 PM
  #4  
Mighty Mouse-RCU's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (145)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Picayune, MS
Default RE: Need opinions on two low arfs

Dont think you could go wrong with either one. But my vote goes to the 4 Star. Great trainer or beginner aerobatic plane.
Old 05-10-2004 | 05:00 PM
  #5  
SkyDude's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Default RE: Need opinions on two low arfs

IMHO, the SuperSportster is not that far from a 4-Star, just maybe a little faster. From what I've heard, many people consider the SS as a good first wing low aircraft. You may want to just use that and save yourself a buying a plane that will be very close to performance. You could always use a buddy box for the first few flights until you're comfortable with it.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.