Aresti With Inverted OS70
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Edgewood,
KY
I finally got my OS70 mounted on my Aresti with Sig mounts. (Thanks Stomper.) Here's my concern. The top of the carb intake is approx. 3/4" below the fuel tank centerline. Can I expect to have siphoning problems?
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (50)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Houston, TX
Hmmm, you WOULD think so, huh? Try it and see. I'm assuming you have checked to see if you could lower the tank? If not, check it out. It might be possible.
#3
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Edgewood,
KY
Thanks Aeronaut,
I was hoping to install the fuel tank so it's cap would protrude through the hole in the firewall as per plan. I suppose I could install the tank lower in the fuse and close off the hole a bit. I was just curious if anyone with a similar setup had problems with this, and what their solutions were.
I remember on another thread here, somewhere, someone mentions that a fuel valve would prevent siphoning when the probe was inserted. The prob could be left in after fueling, and removed just before starting. Might be worth a try, if siphoning becomes a problem.
I was hoping to install the fuel tank so it's cap would protrude through the hole in the firewall as per plan. I suppose I could install the tank lower in the fuse and close off the hole a bit. I was just curious if anyone with a similar setup had problems with this, and what their solutions were.
I remember on another thread here, somewhere, someone mentions that a fuel valve would prevent siphoning when the probe was inserted. The prob could be left in after fueling, and removed just before starting. Might be worth a try, if siphoning becomes a problem.
#4
Senior Member
I ran my plane with an inverted engine and never had any real problem with siphoning. My tank was about no less than 0.5" above the carb. I did not use a fueling valve but re-fueled using the carb fuel line. Its a bit more tedious but no siphoning. I do not prime the engine prior to starting and it starts fine, hand started mind you. I find inverted engines have starting problems as the fuel DOES NOT feed into the combustion chamber properly.
#8
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Edgewood,
KY
I just noticed I never reported back on my OS 70/Aresti arrangement. The engine worked perfectly. I did need some help adjusting the low end. But ultimately it ran beautifully. I had a lot of fun with the Aresti for most of last summer. But around mid August I dumb-thumbed it into a soybean field and pretty much destroyed the plane. I've since cleaned up the OS70 and installed it inverted on a Venus 40. The engine runs nicely, but I had trouble adjusting the low end again. I'll try again this weekend. This setup may be dicier, since I don't think I have the tank centerline and carb near as close as I did with the Aresti.




