Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > ARF or RTF
 GP Stearman Incidence Question >

GP Stearman Incidence Question

Community
Search
Notices
ARF or RTF Discuss ARF (Almost Ready to Fly) radio control airplanes here.

GP Stearman Incidence Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-27-2004 | 03:42 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Seymour, IN
Default GP Stearman Incidence Question

My GP Stearman was going along great until it came time to mount the top wing. With the N strut brackets and N struts mounted and the cabanes mounted to the top wing with all the screws still loose in all these parts I am getting a bad fit of the cabanes to the fuse. If I gently force the cabanes to the fuse the top wing incidence is +3 degrees with the bottom wing and tail at 0. Have any of you experienced a similar condition and if so what did you do? The cabane mounting angles do not seem to fit well at all when mating up to the fuse. I have checked and rechecked to make sure the top wing brackets are on the top wing, etc. and the N struts are on correctly and the cabanes mounted correctly as well. The picture does not show well the gap that is between the fuse and cabane but it is approximately 1/4". Any advise is appreciated.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Xv63146.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	24.8 KB
ID:	197045  
Old 11-29-2004 | 11:58 AM
  #2  
Bax
My Feedback: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 19,483
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
From: Monticello, IL
Default RE: GP Stearman Incidence Question

Please check the 'N' struts. If they are mounted upside-down and backwards, you can get the top wing's incidence off. We've seen this happen a few times.
Old 11-29-2004 | 06:38 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Seymour, IN
Default RE: GP Stearman Incidence Question

Bax, you are absolutely correct. That is exactly what happened. After changing the N struts to upside down and backwards to what they were the wing fits perfectly. The pictures show how the it is set up now with the correct fit. Please note that the instruction manual clearly states that the arrows on the struts are to be up and forward. Now that the arrows are down and pointing to the rear everything is fine. I can only hope that I have the only kit that was marked incorrectly but I have my doubts on that. There definately needs to be some mention of wing incidence in the instruction manual. Without it, a new modeler could end up with a real mess on his hands that does not fly well at all.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Db85338.jpg
Views:	22
Size:	54.5 KB
ID:	197805   Click image for larger version

Name:	Fa86832.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	28.4 KB
ID:	197806  
Old 11-29-2004 | 09:15 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: ypsilanti, MI
Default RE: GP Stearman Incidence Question

Mr Scale,
I think you will find that setting the top wing incidence to negative 2 degrees (leading edge down) will improve at least three things; pitch coupling during knife edge flight, inverted fligtht stability, and landing ease. If it's not practical to do this, raise the upper wing's ailerons a quarter inch when in the neutral position.

Regards,
DrGO

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.