H 9 Taylorcraft
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Auckland, NEW ZEALAND
Well i have my New H9 Taylorcraft, what a Great Model , well constructed , Looooks Great.
Iam using a M v v s 1.60 Gas Engine which i hope meets my expectations .
When i get my new Computer will Post Photos.
Ray
Iam using a M v v s 1.60 Gas Engine which i hope meets my expectations .
When i get my new Computer will Post Photos.
Ray
#5
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Huntsville, AL
Thanks, and I tend to agree. I just hate to spring for a new four stroke, but looks like the Saito 1.80 is the best way to go. The smell of gasoline in my van would be unaceptable!
#6
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dallas, TX,
Ray,
Let us know how the MVVS 1.60 works out. I just received my 1.60 (for another plane) and was thinking another one in the H9 T-Craft would be just the ticket. Not too sure about the power though.
Mark
Let us know how the MVVS 1.60 works out. I just received my 1.60 (for another plane) and was thinking another one in the H9 T-Craft would be just the ticket. Not too sure about the power though.
Mark
#7
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Lenox Township, Michigan
I've got a Saito 1.8 in mine. Plenty of power, but a gas hog. What a sweet flyer. One of the best ARF's I've purchased. Hanger 9's quality sure has improved in the last year or so.
If you're planning on runnin' a 1.8 Saito, I would suggest a larger fuel tank than the one supplied with the kit. I believe I increased the tank size by about 6 ounces.
If you're planning on runnin' a 1.8 Saito, I would suggest a larger fuel tank than the one supplied with the kit. I believe I increased the tank size by about 6 ounces.




