Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > ARF or RTF
Wm P-51? >

Wm P-51?

Community
Search
Notices
ARF or RTF Discuss ARF (Almost Ready to Fly) radio control airplanes here.

Wm P-51?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-11-2002 | 09:50 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: New Bern, NC
Default Wm P-51?

I just received one of the 40 size WM P-51's as a gift, not for any special occasion, just out of the blue....nice! Never worked with World Model planes before and wondered if it is a decent plane? I do have a Saito 72 coming back from repair and a OS 46 FX on the bench. Don't know if a 13-6 prop on the Saito would have clearance problems, It was close on my Pizzaz and ended up putting on larger wheels to gain some ground clearance. Which would you recommend(72 or 46)? Also have a Futaba flight pack with S3004 servos and was wondering if these would suffice, as no torque recommendations were in the so called manual.

Thanks,

Mike
Old 10-11-2002 | 10:49 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: staten island, NY,
Default You did good

A guy in my club has one, and it flies great. He has the Yellow one with a YS 53, and he raves about it.

It does cut a gorgeous picture as it goes by with the gears up,

Steve
Old 10-11-2002 | 11:31 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Mt. Vernon, IN
Default Love Mine!

I love mine. Bilt easy and flys better. I have an OS 70 4 stroke in mine. Nothing like a plane that picks it's feet up when it is done with them.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	30025_2828.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	18.1 KB
ID:	19181  
Old 10-12-2002 | 12:22 AM
  #4  
Richard L.'s Avatar
My Feedback: (24)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,788
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Renton, WA
Default Wm P-51?

Originally posted by Ground Zero:
Which would you recommend(72 or 46)?
Put the Saito 72 in it. IMHO, a Mustang doesn't sound right when powered by the OS 46FX or any other 2-stroke engine. You should not have ground clearance issue with the 13x6 prop.
Old 10-12-2002 | 12:35 AM
  #5  
Cyclic Hardover's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 7,296
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: New Mexico,
Default Wm P-51?

Here is my WM P51. They use to come as ARC so I could cover it myself. I run a ST G90 with a 12/10apc. I guess this can give and idea of how much to go eh? Go with that fourstroke you have. Rund it inverted and you wont have to mess up the cowl on the sides or top.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	30057_8393.jpg
Views:	30
Size:	50.8 KB
ID:	19182  
Old 10-12-2002 | 12:52 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Fenton, MO
Default Wm P-51?

I have the Miss America with a Saito 72, and use an APC 13x6. JR radio gear, standard servos. No prop clearance problems, Been flying this plane for one year now and still love this plane! Enjoy it!
Old 10-12-2002 | 10:16 PM
  #7  
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Brooklyn, NY
Default Wm P-51?

I just got my WM dago red p51 and love it. It was a snap to put together and flew great. Guys at my field were saying I shoud have put a 70 in it but I had a Os SF46 laying around and decided to try it. It flies great even with the 46, fast, stable. Like everyone says about this plane, it doesnt slow down too much for landings, So give yourself some room to bring her in. My next P51 will be a warbird scheme with the 4 stroke in it.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	30215_13157.jpg
Views:	34
Size:	74.1 KB
ID:	19183  
Old 10-13-2002 | 09:14 PM
  #8  
My Feedback: (72)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Gardnerville, NV
Default World 40 size P-51

I've had two of these birds, one with a T.T.46 Pro and the other with a K&B Screamin 48. Both engines were inverted with stock mufflers.
It's not uncommon to find these planes powered with 91 4 strokes but the gear wire is a little soft and needs to be adjusted offten but it's easy to do. Mine was clocked at 98 mph while entering the traps after a dive with the K&B engine.
Old 11-29-2002 | 09:46 PM
  #9  
My Feedback: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,970
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
From: Lahaina, HI
Default Wm P-51D

That is one great flying model. I've seen engines from plain bearing .40's to ST .90"s fly, and never a problem. Lands almost as slow as a low wing trainer, and Wm sells parts if you ding your fighter!

Soft landings always,

Bob of Maui
Old 11-30-2002 | 05:27 PM
  #10  
Flyboy Dave's Avatar
My Feedback: (21)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 13,864
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
From: Pinon Hills, CA
Default Wm P-51?

The 3004's will work just fine, had 'em in mine.

Dave.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	38442_5977.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	19.1 KB
ID:	19184  
Old 11-30-2002 | 09:56 PM
  #11  
mugenkidd's Avatar
My Feedback: (94)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,758
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Default go with the .46

I had an OS 46 fx in my Miss America version, it was running a 10x7 prop and it hauled A$#. The retracts held up well on my grass field. This plane flew great with the engine and if you mount it sideways all that will need to stick out is the cylinder head and carb opening, no muffler or anything else. No overheating problems either. It might just be me, but a 4 stroke engine doesn't sound any better, just different a 2 or 4 stroke engine that is less than 1 cu in. will sound like a little model no matter what. I live in Oklahoma and I was very comfortable flying this plane in 20+ mph winds with my setup. All in all it is an excellent plane, capable of tons of maneuvers.
Old 12-01-2002 | 02:09 AM
  #12  
BUCKETOBOLTS's Avatar
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Salisbury, NC
Default Wm P-51?

I have a Dago with a TT46 and a bisson pitts muffler. I use Hitec 425's. The engine tacks about 14,400 with a 10x6 APC. Several other guys in my club have the WM p51 with same engine. Makes for a great afternoon of informal races.
Old 12-01-2002 | 05:49 AM
  #13  
My Feedback: (58)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Milford, OH
Default Love that World P-51

YS 53 up front, open pipe, sounds great! 12 x 6 prop, moving up to 13 x 6 on next engine. No clearance problems, easy soft landings.

Agree 100% on the low pass, gear up fly by's. They look and sound great! Third season. Just pulled engine tonight for another project (Yellow 30 sized Sukhoi 31M) and will install YS63. Great airplane. I recovered the tail in bright yellow and added some other minor scale details. Also sprayed overall with flat clear. Sorry about the fuzzy picture, 3 seaons ago, pre-digital camera!
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	38517_7037.jpg
Views:	25
Size:	31.4 KB
ID:	19185  
Old 12-01-2002 | 03:11 PM
  #14  
IronCross's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NearBy, AZ
Default Wm P-51?

I have a Dago with a Saito .72 in it. Great combination. Great flying airplane. Balance came out right on the mark with the Saito.
Old 12-02-2002 | 06:20 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
My Feedback: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: renton, WA
Default dago

I have the WM Dao Red with a saito 91 the thing fly's sweet 13 x 8 prop no problem
Old 12-02-2002 | 07:40 AM
  #16  
Flyboy Dave's Avatar
My Feedback: (21)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 13,864
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
From: Pinon Hills, CA
Default Wm P-51?

I ran an O.S. .91 4-stroke in my Dago Red....If I were
to use a two stroke....it would be a Rossi .61.

Inverted, of course....and the muffler will clear the
left side of the cowling.

SEE YA !!!!

Dave.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	38729_5977.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	38.6 KB
ID:	19186  
Old 12-03-2002 | 12:19 AM
  #17  
My Feedback: (506)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: St. Thomas, VIRGIN ISLANDS (USA)
Default Wm P-51?

I have a Miss America. Originally powered it with an OS .70 and 12x7 props - it was nice.

Current setup is a Saito .91 and a 13x8 prop. It is Faster

Still looking for more speed, though. I have an APC 11x12 prop which I plan to try on it, but I'll have to save that one for a windy day as douby that such a teeny prop will provide much in the way of braking when it comes time to slow down . . .
Old 12-03-2002 | 03:49 AM
  #18  
Richard L.'s Avatar
My Feedback: (24)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,788
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Renton, WA
Default Wm P-51?

visioneer_one, if you are looking for more speed for your Miss America, trying sticking either a YS FZ63 or a YS FZ91 in it. Those engines haul *****. I have a YS 63 in my 40-size Zero, spinning a Graupner prop at 11,200 rpm. My Zero has the same speed and vertical performance as an H9 Mustang powered by a Saito 100. We were flying together, and the Mustang couldn't overtake me at full throttle. I was definitely faster than a 40-size Mustang powered by a Saito 80.
Old 12-03-2002 | 07:19 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Kota Bharu, MALAYSIA
Default Wm P-51?

Richard L,

Is that World Model Zero? What prop ru running? What is the weight of the Zero? The YS 63 at 11,200 rpm will unload in the air. Wouldn't it approach the 12000 design limit RPM?

Sorry for the barrage of questions but I too am trying to overtake a 61FX (11X7 prop) powered WM Zero.

Thanks
Hisham
Old 12-03-2002 | 04:52 PM
  #20  
Richard L.'s Avatar
My Feedback: (24)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,788
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Renton, WA
Default Wm P-51?

GAGAK, that's a VQ Zero. It weighs 7 lbs. 1.8 oz. I asked Dave Shadel in the YS Engines Support Forum about the high RPM, and he said it was fine. In fact, he said that you'll encounter problems if you run the YS 63 too slow. Here is the link to the thread:

http://www.rcuniverse.com/showthread...52&forumid=156

My YS 63 peaks out at around 11,500 rpm..
Old 12-04-2002 | 03:52 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Kota Bharu, MALAYSIA
Default Wm P-51?

Richard L,

Thank u for the link and according to Barry's thrust, hp calculator ur going at 76.23 mph. For those interested u can download the calculator here:

http://www.bmaps.net/

Hisham
Old 12-04-2002 | 05:24 PM
  #22  
My Feedback: (506)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: St. Thomas, VIRGIN ISLANDS (USA)
Default Wm P-51?

I had a YS .63 on my Ultra Stick 40. I really like this engine, and considered getting another one for the Mustang. I ended up picking up a YS .91AC in the swapshop, but have decided against using this one on the Mustang as it weighs quite a bit more than the Saito. Out field is on the small (and rough!) side, so heavy planes tend not to last long.

The YS .91 will be going onto my UCD3D.
Old 12-09-2002 | 06:36 PM
  #23  
My Feedback: (506)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: St. Thomas, VIRGIN ISLANDS (USA)
Default Wm P-51?

Well, I tried out an APC 11x12 "Pattern" prop this weekend. My Saito .91 turned this prop 9550 rpm when richened for flight.

The result - 90+ MPH cruising at WOT, easily 100+ while diving. Vertical is not unlimited, but there's plenty. This prop is actually a lighter load on the engine as it unloads quite a bit in the air. I can't even describe how smoothly it runs whilke at speed!

The downside? Very strong P-factor which increases while accelerating. The plane will pull slightly to the left, which made it a little more difficult to fly traditional oval race lines... had to trim in a little rudder to counteract. Forget about prop braking effect. We had minimal wind yesterday, and all my landings except one went long.

It also isn't a real "thrusty" prop. The plane was more aerobatic at lower speeds with the bigger diameter prop. No surprise there.

The verdict? I'm keeping this prop handy for windy days, and will try a 13x7 / 12x8 for calm days.
Old 12-10-2002 | 04:49 AM
  #24  
My Feedback: (506)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: St. Thomas, VIRGIN ISLANDS (USA)
Default Wm P-51?

Did I mention the rain yesterday? I guess not.

"Passing clouds" we call them. Big 'ol angry rainclouds that dump huge amounts of water in a short time.

What follows represents the field after ~3 minutes of *hard* rainfall.



The water level was higher than what you see above. When I pulled the bird from under the jeep the bellypan was *full* of water. Good thing its made of fiberglass.

Mental note. Don't Park In The Low Spot Anymore!

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.