.25 size Gee Bee ARF
#1
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (94)
Has anyone seen/flown the AKM .25 size gee bee???? Looks really cute and maybe something fun and different to throw in the trunk. For $89.95 its not too bad of a deal either.
http://www.ak-models.com/geebee25.htm


http://www.ak-models.com/geebee25.htm


#3
Thread Starter

My Feedback: (94)
I'm sure the webra would work, gee bees usually come out tail heavy do to the short nose. I'm really thinking about getting one of these just to through around. Just trying to decide on the engine. I've had two GMS .32 and both were reliable rockets, but if it can take the extra weight up front a .40 might be even better, I hate putting dead weight in the nose of an airplane to balance it.
#7
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: milford,
OH
I noticed the scallops also: very unscale like. Too large at the wing tip. Was going to purchase until I saw that. Would like to hear about flight characteristics though.
#10
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: milford,
OH
Mugen: the scallops are the half-circular red patterns on the leading edge of the wings. As said by my compatriot... for $89.95 you get stand-way-way-off scale. Mark
#11
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Taipei, TAIWAN
i have the 25 NIB and first impression that it's not as stubby as the other GeeBees. this is good and bad. good is that it's going to be easier to balance because the fuse seems longer than on the larger ones. bad because it doesn't look that scale. this plane is definitely fun scale. construction is not as robust and the cowl is thin but then again, it's only a 25 size plane so i guess all that is not unacceptable. i am putting a 32sx with pitts muffler in mine. second or third project.
#13
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Iowa CityIA
Just to bring all the red flags down, at the time of the website publishing we did not have actual pictures of assembled GeeBee25 so as you all guessed it we used GeeBee120 picture instead.
To see what the GeeBee looks like assembled please visit: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showt...01#post4030857
It is for electric set-up but the looks will be the same.
To see what the GeeBee looks like assembled please visit: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showt...01#post4030857
It is for electric set-up but the looks will be the same.
#15
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Iowa CityIA
If you are looking for 100% scale than 1/48 plastic models would be the choice.
If you looking for good flying GeeBee 25 than our kit is the way to go.
There is always a trade off…
If you looking for good flying GeeBee 25 than our kit is the way to go.
There is always a trade off…
ORIGINAL: TLH101
Well that picture pretty much confirms the odd scallops and out of proportion fuse.[:-]
Well that picture pretty much confirms the odd scallops and out of proportion fuse.[:-]
#18

My Feedback: (3)
Then don't buy it. As has been said already, it's only $89.95. For that price, if it's recognizable and flies well, one has gotten their money's worth. If you want perfection, build one.
Next there'll be somebody complaining that it won't hover...
Dave Olson
#21

My Feedback: (3)
ORIGINAL: TLH101
If you guys are willing to settle for this, then ARFs will never improve.
If you guys are willing to settle for this, then ARFs will never improve.
Kits in general, and ARF's in particular, must be designed to fly well - the main criteria of those who must rely on the manufacturers. This often involves alteration of the lifting and control surfaces, and the moments - compared to the full-scale plane. Liberties are even taken - as in this case - with the color schemes.
If the buyers like them, lots of them will be sold, and the scale fans will object.
I might not buy one of these GeeBees.... but I submit that if you offer me an exact scale GeeBee for $89, that flies as well as my old Vmar Extra (or even the 40 size Tequila Sunrise that I retired), I will join the throngs of people ordering a copy.
Best wishes,
Dave Olson
#22

My Feedback: (12)
ORIGINAL: TLH101
If you guys are willing to settle for this, then ARFs will never improve.
If you guys are willing to settle for this, then ARFs will never improve.
ARFs are improving, but they're never going to get to the point where the person who builds competition scale models from scratch will be happy. I think it's safe to say that for the average sport flyer, strict compliance to the original airplane design is way less important than how the thing flies. What's the point of a Gee Bee ARF that looks exactly like the original if it's so difficult to fly that 95% of them crash on the first flight. ARFs are about flying, not concours d'elegance.
#23
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Taipei, TAIWAN
i have to say i agree with most of the comments. its just that everyone has a different tolerance for scaleness. lets look at the kyosho geebee, which i believe adheres to piper chuck's notion that 95% of them crash on the first flight. it's a great scale rendition of the geebee but a monster to fly (so my friend, who's first flight ended up in cartwheels, says). on the other extreme there are the world models aircombat series which look absolutely un-scale. then there are all those in between.
i bought this geebee because it was easier to fly (guaranteed by the LHS owner) and looked still cute. of course i would like it to look more scale but then that is the tradeoff i'm willing to make on this plane.
i bought this geebee because it was easier to fly (guaranteed by the LHS owner) and looked still cute. of course i would like it to look more scale but then that is the tradeoff i'm willing to make on this plane.


