Graupner AT 6 Harvard
12-11-2002 | 09:43 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: roma, ITALY
Graupner AT 6 Harvard
Any experience with the Graupner AT 6 Harvard ? What engine, how it flies, and so on ?
I have an OS 52, but someone told me it's a little on the small side.
Thank you.
I have an OS 52, but someone told me it's a little on the small side.
Thank you.
01-06-2006 | 08:53 AM
#2
My Feedback: (36)
RE: Graupner AT 6 Harvard
Pastem,
I do not have any personal experience with the Graupner AT 6 (yet), but I did do a little research on it and have heard nothing but good things as far as its quality and flight characteristics. I just order one and plan on putting a Saito FS 72 that I currently have available in it. I believe it should be ok. The attached link to the Graupner AT 6 page http://shop.graupner.de/webuerp/servlet/AI?ARTN=9381 has a little info on it, but some of the specs that I have gathered indicate that its assembled weight is about 7.0 lbs and the recommende motor range is 2-stroke 7.45 cc (46) to 8.17 cc (50) max, 4-stroke 14.95 cc (91) max (seems a little narrow for a motor range). Graupner also sells the ARF as a combo with an OS 46. Based on that it would seem that your 52 would be ok.
Hope this helps,
Mark
I do not have any personal experience with the Graupner AT 6 (yet), but I did do a little research on it and have heard nothing but good things as far as its quality and flight characteristics. I just order one and plan on putting a Saito FS 72 that I currently have available in it. I believe it should be ok. The attached link to the Graupner AT 6 page http://shop.graupner.de/webuerp/servlet/AI?ARTN=9381 has a little info on it, but some of the specs that I have gathered indicate that its assembled weight is about 7.0 lbs and the recommende motor range is 2-stroke 7.45 cc (46) to 8.17 cc (50) max, 4-stroke 14.95 cc (91) max (seems a little narrow for a motor range). Graupner also sells the ARF as a combo with an OS 46. Based on that it would seem that your 52 would be ok.
Hope this helps,
Mark
