Tower Voyager balancing problem
#1
Thread Starter
Junior Member
My Feedback: (46)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: lynchburg,
VA
Hi,
I just finished putting together my Tower Voyager last evening, put a 46fx on it. Built in according to plan but was very surprised when I balanced it. Everything was installed except the battery, my plan was to set the plane up on its balancing points and then balance it with battery placement. To my surprise, the plane would not balance until I put the battery on the stabilizer. So it looks like I'll be adding a bunch of weight. Does this seem reasonable?
I just finished putting together my Tower Voyager last evening, put a 46fx on it. Built in according to plan but was very surprised when I balanced it. Everything was installed except the battery, my plan was to set the plane up on its balancing points and then balance it with battery placement. To my surprise, the plane would not balance until I put the battery on the stabilizer. So it looks like I'll be adding a bunch of weight. Does this seem reasonable?
#2
Senior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: League City,
TX
Seems odd to me. I had to add weight to the front of mine. Also, my battery was in the front under the fuel tank (if memory serves). AND I had replaced half of the firewall which added even more weight to the front. I had an os 46LA on mine with a plastic spinner and a
master airscrew prop. Mine sure was tail heavy for some reason. Got a lot of great flights out of that plane till my friend cracked it up. Bummer... Sure took a pounding though
master airscrew prop. Mine sure was tail heavy for some reason. Got a lot of great flights out of that plane till my friend cracked it up. Bummer... Sure took a pounding though
#3
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: San Antonio,
TX
Of the two voyagers I had (still have one that is not together) they both balanced nose heavy.
I ended up putting the battery under the servos on the MKII and about two or three ounces of lead on tail.
Half the lead on one side and the rest on the otherside of the tail.
The other option is to build a hatch on the bottom side of the fuse behind the wing saddle and place the battery on it.
You will still have to add lead to the tail.
John
I ended up putting the battery under the servos on the MKII and about two or three ounces of lead on tail.
Half the lead on one side and the rest on the otherside of the tail.
The other option is to build a hatch on the bottom side of the fuse behind the wing saddle and place the battery on it.
You will still have to add lead to the tail.
John
#5

My Feedback: (9)
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Oak Harbor, WA
I had one of the older Voyagers and it balanced tail heavy, that was a few years ago. I just bought and built the MkII and it came out nose heavy. I'm not sure how much lead I'll have to put in it yet. I also used a 46FX on mine. I thought it was strange and that maybe I did something wrong but now I guess not.
The old Voyager was a good flyer which is why I decided to get another one.
Happy flying.
The old Voyager was a good flyer which is why I decided to get another one.
Happy flying.
#6
Well, the .46 FX is around 17 ounces and the .46 LA is around 13 ounces with muffler. Changing the weight clear out on the nose by a quarter of a pound will certainly affect the balance. Maybe the key is getting an idea of weight distribution before selecting the engine?
#7
I also had to add some nose weight to mine, so later on I put an old 60 on it and it flew great without any extra weights, and man was that a fun plane to fool around with- until it literally fell to pieces after many many flights. but even with several ounces of weight in the tail, yours should fly fine. Its a pretty light plane.




