Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > ARF or RTF
First warbird need help deciding >

First warbird need help deciding

Community
Search
Notices
ARF or RTF Discuss ARF (Almost Ready to Fly) radio control airplanes here.

First warbird need help deciding

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-2002 | 04:10 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tulsa, OK
Default First warbird need help deciding

Hello all,

Well I am trying to decide on my first warbird. I have pretty much decided between the Kyosho Spitfire or the Kyosho Bf109. I am currently leaning towards the 109 as I love german aircraft from WWII, especially the 110 and 111 to bad there aren't any ARFs of either. I flew a GP P51D ARF today and was able to take off do some rolls and loops and low fly bys and of coarse land with no troubles. So does anyone have any other suggestions or comments on any those two Kyosho models or maybe a suggestion on another model? I hope this all made sense and thanks.
Old 12-22-2002 | 11:59 PM
  #2  
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 8,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Waseca, MN
Default 1st Warbird

My first Warbird was the World Models P-51. I would recommend this plane to anyone. I also have a Kyosho Spit, and although it flies great, the P-51 was a better airplane.

The Kyosho planes have printed sticky back covering that is NOT completely fuel proof. They look pretty darn good at about 10 feet, but the covering starts to lift up after a bit, and is hard to get stuck back down. The World Mustang costs a tad more, but does come with mechanical Retracts, a Pilot, and a few other goodies that you don't get with a kyosho kit.


As long as you've flown some sort of intermediate tail dragger plane, I don't think you would have trouble flying either of the planes above.

I had a Modeltech Me-109, and it did not compare to the kyosho or World ARFs.
Old 12-23-2002 | 03:04 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tulsa, OK
Default First warbird need help deciding

So are you saying stay away from the Modeltech Me-109?
Old 12-23-2002 | 05:43 PM
  #4  
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 8,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Waseca, MN
Default Modeltech ME-109

Yes I would stay away from this plane.

It actually looks pretty good, but didn't fly all that well. It took off, and landed nice, but loved to snap out of loops, and turns if you used too much elevator.

If you backed the throws down so it wouldn't snap you had very little throw.

I ended up giving it away. (that tells you how much I liked it).

I can't remember too many specifics, but there were quite a few weird things with the assembly process I didn't like. For some reason it took me an awfullly long time getting this thing ready to fly.
Old 12-23-2002 | 07:01 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tulsa, OK
Default First warbird need help deciding

Well I went ahead and ordered the Kyosho Bf109 model. I was at the local hobby shop and saw the awesome looking Kyosho Gee Bee ARF and decided that I wanted a Kyosho model(the shop also had the GP Stuka and I might get that next). I can't wait to get the model here and start putting it togehter. I must say my main reason for staying away from the P-51 is the fact that I have seen a lot of them and want something that is different from everyone else. Well I will keep everyone posted during my building and eventual flying of the Bf109.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.