Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > ARF or RTF
Reload this Page >

Hangar 9 p-47 vs p-51

Community
Search
Notices
ARF or RTF Discuss ARF (Almost Ready to Fly) radio control airplanes here.

Hangar 9 p-47 vs p-51

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-30-2006, 06:16 AM
  #1  
fprovost
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: , QC,
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Hangar 9 p-47 vs p-51

Hi there

I would like to ear from anyone who has flown either ( or preferably both )

of these plane to tell me about them .

Is one easier than the other ( ie: low speed , stall caracteristics ) ? .

I read in a review that the position of the tank on the p-47 ( a bit high compared to the carburator) might
render proper idle a bit difficult to optain without a glow driver ... did you have a similar experience ?
Did p-51 guys have similar experiences ?

Thanks

FProvost
Old 08-30-2006, 08:03 AM
  #2  
CAPT John
My Feedback: (15)
 
CAPT John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: MEMPHIS, TN
Posts: 228
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Hangar 9 p-47 vs p-51

ORIGINAL: fprovost

Hi there

I would like to ear from anyone who has flown either ( or preferably both )

of these plane to tell me about them .

Is one easier than the other ( ie: low speed , stall caracteristics ) ? .

I read in a review that the position of the tank on the p-47 ( a bit high compared to the carburator) might
render proper idle a bit difficult to optain without a glow driver ... did you have a similar experience ?
Did p-51 guys have similar experiences ?
FProvost,

I have the H9 P-47 and love it. I haven't flown the H9 P-51, but from my discussions and observation I believe the P-47 is a bit easier to fly. The large wing area makes it an easy warbird to land. My Jug doesn't have the nose over tendency of most H9 Mustangs (although I upgraded to Robart retracts and Robostruts).

I can't give you a good answer on the tank position impact on idle as I have an onboard glow driver which helps the OS-91 FS maintain a reliable, slow idle.

John
Old 08-30-2006, 01:31 PM
  #3  
oldtyme
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Hangar 9 p-47 vs p-51


ORIGINAL: Old Navy Flyer

ORIGINAL: fprovost

Hi there

I would like to ear from anyone who has flown either ( or preferably both )

of these plane to tell me about them .

Is one easier than the other ( ie: low speed , stall caracteristics ) ? .

I read in a review that the position of the tank on the p-47 ( a bit high compared to the carburator) might
render proper idle a bit difficult to optain without a glow driver ... did you have a similar experience ?
Did p-51 guys have similar experiences ?
FProvost,

I have the H9 P-47 and love it. I haven't flown the H9 P-51, but from my discussions and observation I believe the P-47 is a bit easier to fly. The large wing area makes it an easy warbird to land. My Jug doesn't have the nose over tendency of most H9 Mustangs (although I upgraded to Robart retracts and Robostruts).

I can't give you a good answer on the tank position impact on idle as I have an onboard glow driver which helps the OS-91 FS maintain a reliable, slow idle.

John
Hey John........haven't been here for awhile......good to see you're still flying the Jug. I changed from rcandy to oldtyme........(so you'll remember who I am).

In response to the original question, we have two of these birds at our field and neither have troubles with the tank location. I have read this about the H9 AT6 also and I have not had a problem with that either.

Cheers,
Andy
Old 08-30-2006, 10:31 PM
  #4  
dasintex
My Feedback: (10)
 
dasintex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Displaced Canadian in Central Texas TX
Posts: 2,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Hangar 9 p-47 vs p-51

No Problem with my H9 Jug; I've yet to nose it over, plenty of P-51's will. My 2 cents worth.
Old 08-30-2006, 10:38 PM
  #5  
CAPT John
My Feedback: (15)
 
CAPT John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: MEMPHIS, TN
Posts: 228
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Hangar 9 p-47 vs p-51

Andy & Doug,
It's good to hear from you guys again. I've been watching the H9 P47 thread continue to grow, but haven't posted much lately. My Jug has taken a few lickin's and keeps on flying (some repairs required). It's my most reliable and enjoyable plane.
Cheers,
John
Old 08-30-2006, 11:25 PM
  #6  
Hellcat716
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Hellcat716's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Hangar 9 p-47 vs p-51

I have had both. They are very easy to fly and I wouldn't say one is eaiser than the other. The stock location for the fuel tank has worked well for me on both planes. I am using the Saito 100 on both planes. Have not had any issues with nose over problems on either plane. Buy the one you like the best. You will not regret either one. Good luck.
Old 08-31-2006, 08:38 AM
  #7  
fprovost
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: , QC,
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Hangar 9 p-47 vs p-51

thanks guys

FP
Old 08-31-2006, 08:48 AM
  #8  
martenson
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Stockholm, SWEDEN
Posts: 508
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Hangar 9 p-47 vs p-51

I have the P-51 with a ST .90 in it, and it is a rocket, but very hard to land and not tip over.
If you fly on grass it should be cut like a golf green to not tip over.

And I have a .60 size Black horse P-47 and I think it flies a lot better and cleaner then the Mustang, I have an old HP .61 in this one.
With the flaps down it lands like a trainer on all 3 wheels.

Just my 2 cents.

Joakim
Old 08-31-2006, 05:52 PM
  #9  
bluemagic98
Senior Member
 
bluemagic98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wisconsin Rapids, WI
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Hangar 9 p-47 vs p-51

Hi

I have the Hangar 9 P-51 and i balanced it farther back than spec its at the very rear of the wheel wells or 5-1/2 back the recomended is 4-3/4 I havent noticed any bad habits and it amazes everyone as to how slow it fly's its stall is a jentle drop to the left but wont snap over a bit of throttle managment and she floats in for 3 pointers. we have a very nice field and its well kept so touch and goes all day with no troubles except for my landing gear i think they updated them mine get out of adjustment sitting on the runway on a hot day and ive lost a set of retract servo gears $3 wont kill me a set of robarts is next. I love this plane.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Xv65796.jpg
Views:	188
Size:	61.4 KB
ID:	516711   Click image for larger version

Name:	Jf11917.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	67.8 KB
ID:	516712  
Old 09-01-2006, 04:09 AM
  #10  
martenson
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Stockholm, SWEDEN
Posts: 508
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Hangar 9 p-47 vs p-51

bluemagic98
I will try to put some more weight in the rear and try it.

Joakim

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.