Anyone running this combination? Is the Moki 1.35 enough for the 73" H-9 Cap, or should I go OS 1.60?

Thanks!

Moki 135 is probably fine for lower elevation flying. It might not have unlimited vertical or hoverability.

My opinion is that it would be just fine for IMAC or sport flying, but a bit underpowered for 3D.

That's kind of what I thought. I have the OS 1.60 in my H-9 Edge and love it . . .

I have a Moki 2.10 in a Lanier 80" CAP 232 with a Mejzlik 20X10 carbon prop. The plane weighs about 17 lb. dry and I live at sea level. The plane flies great. But, it's not enough power to do 3-D even if I had the skill. It will just hover at full throttle. I like the combination a lot and I wouldn't give up any of the power.

Yeah i would go with the O.S 1.60 thats what im putting in my TT giles 202 70" Moki's 1.80 and 2.10 too much weight

put the os 1.60 in it you wont be sorry a buddy of mine had a moki 1.35 in his cap and it did'nt have enough power. i got a os 1.60 in my 540 edge from h-9 with a jett in cowl muffler & a cline reg. and it works great.

just my 2 cents

also got a 1.60 in my h-9 cap 1/4 but have'nt flown yet maybe in april this mi weather SUCK'S

Thanks for the posts.

I went with the OS 1.60. I have one in my H-9 Edge and am really happy with it, so I bought another one.

I have seen one fly with the 1.35 it was less than stellar- and my brother has the same plane with a Moki 2.1 and is obviously overpowered....

A 1.6 should do it depending on what type of flying you are doing-

Oh, you already og it! Well good luck and happy landings.
james