thunder tiger trainer 60??
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Sarasota,
FL
is this plane any good?? i wanted the sig lt40 arf but seems like everyone is out.
would it be better to wait for the sig or go with the above??
thanks
Brian S
would it be better to wait for the sig or go with the above??
thanks
Brian S
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Weirton,
WV
The Sig LT40 is a great plane......I've seen the Tiger Trainer 60 fly and it seems to fly well, but the Sig is built much better, in my opinion. Have you tried all of the mail order places?
Mike
Mike
#3

My Feedback: (48)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Foley, AL
While the Tiger 60 is a good flying plane it is heavier than the LT 40 and requires a 60 size engine, on the other hand the LT 40 has the same wingspan and a good 46 will power it nicely. My LT 40 will knife edge, roll and loop, hangs on the prop very good and then makes nice gentle landings so I guess what I am saying is that I would wait on the LT 40.
#4

My Feedback: (21)
yeah I bought the Thunder tiger 40 trainer, and hate it! it flies great but the lack of quality makes me mad, its got a half plastic fuse held together by a little sticker that runs along the fuse! after 5 flights the plane looks like trash! the lt-40 on the other hand is THE best trainer!!! wait and u wont be sorry...



