Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > ARF or RTF
The best choice >

The best choice

Community
Search
Notices
ARF or RTF Discuss ARF (Almost Ready to Fly) radio control airplanes here.

The best choice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-27-2002 | 01:44 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: albuquerque, NM
Default The best choice

I just purchased a sig somethin extra and was wondering what you would recommend to use for a 2cycle or 4 cycle engine?
Old 02-27-2002 | 02:04 AM
  #2  
DLT
My Feedback: (48)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Foley, AL
Default Sig SE

Put a new TT 46 on mine....very nimble very quick, unlimited vertical, 3 yr warranty, quality engine at $69 (National Hobby).
I have owned about 12 TT's over the last 6 years and there always user friendly from the start.
Old 02-27-2002 | 02:10 AM
  #3  
My Feedback: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,143
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Issaquah, WA
Default The best choice

If you want more help then you should specify some parameters, cost, weight, power, user friendliness, etc. Other than that there are many good .46-.58 two cycle engines out there. Any will do -- pick the brand that you are most comfortable with.

There are fewer 4 stroke choices, but once again there are several good choices in the .52 to .72 range. Pick whichever brand you are most comforable.

Regardless of your choice you will need taller landing gear. The engines in the sizes I have mentioned all work best with a 12", or longer, props. The stock SE gear will not allow you to swing much more than an 11.5" prop. Tnt Landing gear has a taller gear for the SE.

Cheers!

Galen
Old 02-27-2002 | 02:12 AM
  #4  
My Feedback: (67)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,066
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Evansville , IN
Default The best choice

YS 63. I guaruntee you won't be hurting for power. I have seen them fly with this engine and it is a good combination. I have the 63 on a su-do-khoi, and it will excellerate out of a hover like mad. Just my thoughts!
Old 02-27-2002 | 02:18 AM
  #5  
BAS
My Feedback: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Altoona, IA
Default The best choice

I agree with the ys 63 most guys i fly with think i am running a 80 or 90 size four banger when they find out its a 63 they cant hardly believe the power curve it has plus good low end torque Central Hobbies has about the best price on them 239.00 i believe
Old 02-27-2002 | 02:36 AM
  #6  
My Feedback: (67)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,066
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Evansville , IN
Default The best choice

I would just about bet the YS 63 will whip any 70-80 size 4- stroke out there, (maybe even some of the 90 size as well) plus they are relatively light. I am thinking of getting another one for the GP Ultimate? They are great engines.
Old 02-27-2002 | 03:20 AM
  #7  
My Feedback: (26)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Gurnee, IL
Default Somethin Extra engine choice

I have one with a OS 46FX and it is one of my favorites. Engine/airplane combo makes me look good.
Old 02-27-2002 | 03:37 AM
  #8  
Shortman's Avatar
My Feedback: (21)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,966
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Portland, Oregon
Default The best choice

i put a os 70 surpass in my SE, thought havent flown it yet, for a 4-stroke i would go with a ys 63 also, i just happened to have this engine lying around to use... or i would've gone with a ys 63, for a 2-stroke a ys 45 would be sweet! it has a pressurized fuel pump which keeps fuel running consistenly!
Old 02-27-2002 | 04:39 PM
  #9  
My Feedback: (67)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,066
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Evansville , IN
Default The best choice

I had the os 46 fx on mine and it wouldn't hover. My freind also had one with a TT pro 46 on his and it wouldn't hover either. They fly pretty good with these engines but they won't go balistic like they will with the 63. I did see one fly on a 72 saito and it did a pretty good job also. The kid flying with the saito had no problem hanging it up.
Old 02-27-2002 | 10:02 PM
  #10  
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Tucson, AZ
Default The best choice

I put an Irvine 53 on mine and I havent regreated it a bit I have unlimted Verticle I can hover at 1/2 throttle and still have some left over to get me out of trouble. One fine engine and the price is right too.(IMO)
Mark
Old 03-12-2002 | 07:58 PM
  #11  
jelaird's Avatar
My Feedback: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Gilbert, AZ
Default OS 46FX

I like my OS46 Fx on the SE now that it's breaking in. I hover with an 11-5 APC, but have little vertical pull out. from hover. Never a flameout after 1 gallon of fuel. The rear needle valve makes plumbing a hassle in this plane. I had to mount a fuel filler valve to the bottom of the fuselage directly under the engine.
Jack

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.