Im confused??? why do both the companies make practically the same planes, like the dago red for instance? how long has OK models been out? ive never heard of them untill i got M.A.N. Does anyone have or know somebody with the OK Models? are they good or what...

The ok/ez line has been around for quite awhile.The biggest difference between the two is the construction technique.World models builds their airplanes pretty much like you would,and are covered in basically what is ultracote.The ez line uses that foam backed,preprinted mylar covering type,which also adds strength to their planes.The major advantage of world models(just my opinon) is they are easily repairable.The ez line,even with a puncture hole is near impossible to get a good looking repair done .Ez was definitley the best years ago,but as far as I'm concerned the world models line is top notch.

OK Models factory burned down several years (I think about 10) ago. Probably the main reason why you haven't heard of them. I agree with KAJ, World Models builds a stronger plane. On some of the planes the foam backed mylar print looks nice, on others it looks cheap. Sure would hate to have a cheap looking airplane after I spent $300 on it. Which brings me to something else. Almost all of the EZ line is far more expensive when comparing prices of similar planes from different manufacturers.

I recently decided to buy a 45 sized Zero ARF. I was fortunate that my LHS stocked:

1. The WM Zero

2. The EZ Zero

There are pro's and cons to each kit. But in the end, if absolute quality is what you are after, and better authenticity, the EZ wins. They are still the "king of ARF's" IMHO.

I bought the OK EZ Zero after taking a long time to compare the two. Another flyer might prefer the WM.

I have a WM P-40 Warhawk. I have just completed "wing surgery" to get the retracts to work, from new, before the first flight. I don't believe that will be necessary with the EZ. Nowhere near as "scale" as either of the zero's though.

One downside. EZ's are EXPENSIVE!.

So, you pays your money, and you takes your choice. Most ARF'ers would be pretty happy with either of these.

regards


fiery

[QUOTE]Originally posted by FlyinRazorback
[B]OK Models factory burned down several years (I think about 10) ago. Probably the main reason why you haven't heard of them.


They're Back!

MRC/Altech disribute them, and they have recently released a host of new 'planes.

Check 'em out on:

www.modelrec.com/catalog/mrc/index.jsp?cat=141

regards

fiery

I've owned both. Currently, I'm on my third EZ P-51 in ten years. I have also been flying a WM Chipmunk for last last year. For those short on building time, these are in my opinion, the best two ARF manufacturers out there right now in the 40-60 size. Let me try to explain the differences.
For scale outlines, and overall quality of fit and finish, the EZ line of ARF's are amazing. I own the new all aluminum P-51. Pictures cannot do it justice. With just a little trim, I have duplicated "Wee Willie II" based nearby at Chino, CA. Every rivet, panel and line are done very well. The foam skin is very resilient and survives hanger rash better than film. All the EZ models I have flown have been fantastic. An old EZ P-51 powered with a .75 and 7 servo's was as easy to land as a low wing trainer.

Pro's... very scale, high quality, looks and flys great.
Cons...expensive, not easily repairable. Metric hardware.

My experience with World Models is equally favorable. They seem to be well built. I have never heard of a structural failure from World Models. I have tried. I installed a YS 1.20 on my Chipmunk and after more than a year of abuse, my Chipmunk looks and flies brand-new. The film covering is holding up better than expected. I have not had to do any repairs, but they would be easy if needed. There were no defects. The fiberglass cowl is a work of art and matched the film color perfectly. The flying qualities of my World Models Chipmunk are subjective due to the extra weight and power of mine. But I am very pleased with mine.

Pro's...absolutely the best value for the buck. I could not build this straight, light or cover a plane this well. World Models is like a very well built kit.

Con's...I'm struggling here. Marginal metric hardware. I replaced all with 4-40.

Since I won't use Metric hardware on any of my planes, I can't really comment. My experience with both of these ARF companies are favorable. Both filled the role for which they were purchased. Both have survived being overpowered without any structural problems.

do u know a place which has any reviews on the EZ line ARFS?

I'm looking to purchase EZ arfs and will also consider Royal and Hobbico with EZ style construction (mylar over foam). Please email with what you've got!
Thanks.

Shortman, I reviewed both the EZ P51 and Dago Red in RC Excellence magazine. The Dago Red is in this month's issue. They are repairable. Call MRC and ask about the website where the graphics are going to be (or already are) online and available for downloading. They will give you the skinny on it. The Senior Production Manager, Jeff Green, is well versed on how to do the repairs. I haven't tried it but he explained how it's done. Let me know if you have any questions.

John Wells

To me it justs comes down to dollars for how much more quality? Mfr.sug. retail price $370.00 compared to $190.00.
I'm still not a fan of the foam-board planes; although I do fly
the Hobbico 60 size Extra foam-board. My flying skills have
improved greatly since I flew my old EZ 40 size Laser. That
plane began looking like an accordian but still flew great. So
far I haven't dinked the Extra but I'm not anxious to cut foam
to put in a plug patch. I'd much rather cut away covering to
repair balsa then reseal film patch.
Randy

Yea, I pretty much agree. It's sort of un-natural to do that when I'm used to the film. They fly great though.

JW

370$$$!!!! for the EZ line ARF P-51!!! AH ILL STICK TO THE WM P-51 THEN.... that solves everything!

I own both and as in the previous threads there are pro's and con's to each. Both build like a dream. My older FW190 from Ez was a blast with an OS-61.
Here's the kicker.... I was looking for a very realistic P-51 and the choice was either the Kyosho or the EZ. I finally decided on the EZ and called Model Rectifier. This company is awesome!!! I told him I was also interested in the new VooDoo mustang and guess what...He gave me show prices if I bought both. So here I sit with 2 brand new Mustangs. The new mil version is really something to look at. They have gone in and done some upgrades from the older kits so now they go together better and they come with retracts. Sport go with WM. Show stopper go with EZ!!!!

Either way you cant go wrong!!!!!

Just for plan eye-poping good looks. Which EZ the P-51(military) or Voodoo from EZ. comments. Also has anyone actually flown them yet, and how do they do going fast.

Which one???? Well for the warbird fanatics of course the mil version. But for an all out eye popper then it's the Voodoo.
I'll give you an update as soon as I get mine finished. I'm currently working on the VooDoo. Just finished the Wing mounting and about to start the engine install. Then its the tail group and WaaLaa!!!!! Should fly in a week. Oh, I'm installing a YS-45 in it so we should putt pretty good.

The Mil version I'm still waiting on a YS-63 4s I ordered so it will be a little while since I'm still working on my Yellow P-38. Will send pics too.

I've never liked the foam board skinned ARFs, either. They may be snazzy lookin' out of the box, but just you try to repair any damage - even minor ones are next to impossible to make right.

I don't buy my planes to crash, but I've being in RC long enough to know it is an eventuality, not just a possibility.

My vote goes to WM. Their lower end models have quality and prices that just can't be beat. Their higher end models, however, can get just as pricey as any of them.

I have had an EZ Extra 260 for many years and it still flys great and looks great. It required no trim adjustments or CG changes from the plans. Worth ever cent! If only every plane I had was this good.......
Gary