GP Reactor, good or bad?
#1
i want to get this plane and put a Laser .80 in it, but i have been reading all the negativity on it in regards to the covering. is it a kit that i should avoid?
#2
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Auburn,
WA
I don't know about avoid but definately take note of the problems with it. It does fly very well but at some point you may have to replace the covering. There just isn't a whole lot of planes out there that are designed like it. The Fliton Inspire 60 is designed about the same but is more expensive and has covering problems too.
#3

My Feedback: (10)
ORIGINAL: summerwind
i want to get this plane and put a Laser .80 in it, but i have been reading all the negativity on it in regards to the covering. is it a kit that i should avoid?
i want to get this plane and put a Laser .80 in it, but i have been reading all the negativity on it in regards to the covering. is it a kit that i should avoid?
#4

My Feedback: (13)
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,178
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From: Center of the Flyover States,
Zippi, did you seal your covering before getting nitro grease on it or after flying it for a while. I'm about ready to go up with mine, but haven't done anything yet to the covering to protect it. Thanx
#5

My Feedback: (10)
GarySS,
As I do with all ARF's, re-shrink the covering and seal all areas as needed before you get fuel on the plane. I've been checking it over after every trip to the field to make sure nothing is coming loose. So far so good. The plane flys really nice with the Saito .82
As I do with all ARF's, re-shrink the covering and seal all areas as needed before you get fuel on the plane. I've been checking it over after every trip to the field to make sure nothing is coming loose. So far so good. The plane flys really nice with the Saito .82
#6
Zippi,
what servos are you using?......i have a bunch of Futaba s9001's and i know in the manual they recommend 9650's, but those are kinda expensive.......i just want to have fun with this plane.
what servos are you using?......i have a bunch of Futaba s9001's and i know in the manual they recommend 9650's, but those are kinda expensive.......i just want to have fun with this plane.
#7

My Feedback: (10)
ORIGINAL: summerwind
Zippi,
what servos are you using?......i have a bunch of Futaba s9001's and i know in the manual they recommend 9650's, but those are kinda expensive.......i just want to have fun with this plane.
Zippi,
what servos are you using?......i have a bunch of Futaba s9001's and i know in the manual they recommend 9650's, but those are kinda expensive.......i just want to have fun with this plane.
#9
I had serious covering issues on a GP Skybolt. The clear layer on all the checkerboard areas was separating just from handling during assembly. I called GP and they sent me new wings, new tail pieces and even a new fuselage since the tail had already been epoxied in place. The replacement pieces have been much better.
#10
thx for the input guys........my choice of 3D midsize was this or the revolver............i like the looks of this one better, and i have the little electric version and soon the bipe version.........i'll take Chucks advice here and go for it. if the covering is an issue, then i'll get ahold of Barb at Hobbico, she'll make things right.
#12
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Auburn,
WA
I doubt that the 55 AX would be too much. Probably fly it just right. I sure like that Reactor that's a couple of posts up ^^^^^ I might have to get another one. They sure fly nice.
#15
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Barrie,
ON, CANADA
If you haven't already bought it get the Saito 82. Low weight and great power for the Reactor.
Otherwise the 91 setup is about 7oz's heavier and you'll have to move your battery further back to balance. Tank in the belly... it'll fly. She won't float as nice but it'll fly. The additional power will let you hover with a little more authority.
The 55AX would be faster but less thrust, the OS91FS would be more thrust though heavier where as the 82 is right in between both with less weight.
Otherwise the 91 setup is about 7oz's heavier and you'll have to move your battery further back to balance. Tank in the belly... it'll fly. She won't float as nice but it'll fly. The additional power will let you hover with a little more authority.
The 55AX would be faster but less thrust, the OS91FS would be more thrust though heavier where as the 82 is right in between both with less weight.



