Nimh overheat
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Palm Bay,
FL
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nimh overheat
Well:
I charged my 2 year old 1400 MA nimh pack at the recommended max rate of 1.0A on my Hobbico MK 2 field charger. Starting voltage was 4.9 V.
Voltages after meltdown are:
Burned cell 0.0v
1.21
1.26
1.27volts,
Looks like a shorted cell to me. What do you think?
I well try to connect photographs.
I charged my 2 year old 1400 MA nimh pack at the recommended max rate of 1.0A on my Hobbico MK 2 field charger. Starting voltage was 4.9 V.
Voltages after meltdown are:
Burned cell 0.0v
1.21
1.26
1.27volts,
Looks like a shorted cell to me. What do you think?
I well try to connect photographs.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: West Coast,
CA
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Nimh overheat
If it started out with 4.9V then a cell was not internally shorted. Perhaps the "0V" cell's outer wrap was compromised and it shorted against its neighbor. Either that, or the charger went nuts and pumped out more than 1A or the peak was missed and it kept on charging.
#3
Senior Member
My Feedback: (16)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Locust Grove,
GA
Posts: 12,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Nimh overheat
I had the same thing happen to me with my 5 cell RX pack. It melted the pack and almost burned the wood in my plane. I think I will go to a smaller fuse to prevent this from happening with RX packs.
#4
Senior Member
My Feedback: (12)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Martinville,
LA
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Nimh overheat
I thought you were not supposed to charge Nimh batteieas more than 25% of their rating? So if it was 1400mah then the max charge rate should have been no more than 350 mah. Correct?
Ryan
Ryan
#5
My Feedback: (14)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bowling Green,
KY
Posts: 1,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Nimh overheat
Do you know how long the pack was on charge? Did you stop the charge manually? Do you think the charger detected peak? Was it on long enough for the safety timer to stop the charge? Do you get a voltage reading out of the pack itself, or can you only read indvidual cell voltage?
#6
Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Scottsdale,
AZ
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Nimh overheat
My opinion is the MKII failed to detect peak.
I have A MKII that I cannot trust, especialy with NiMh.
Are you sure it started at 4.9?
Its a 4 cell pack, it should of been below 4.8.
If so then it was full.
The charger still should detect peak.
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_16...tm.htm#1607487
I have A MKII that I cannot trust, especialy with NiMh.
Are you sure it started at 4.9?
Its a 4 cell pack, it should of been below 4.8.
If so then it was full.
The charger still should detect peak.
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_16...tm.htm#1607487
#7
Senior Member
My Feedback: (16)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Locust Grove,
GA
Posts: 12,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Nimh overheat
Not true.
The limit that Sanyo and Panasonic set is 1C
The limit that Sanyo and Panasonic set is 1C
ORIGINAL: Ryans Rebel
I thought you were not supposed to charge Nimh batteieas more than 25% of their rating? So if it was 1400mah then the max charge rate should have been no more than 350 mah. Correct?
Ryan
I thought you were not supposed to charge Nimh batteieas more than 25% of their rating? So if it was 1400mah then the max charge rate should have been no more than 350 mah. Correct?
Ryan
#8
RE: Nimh overheat
ORIGINAL: Ryans Rebel
I thought you were not supposed to charge Nimh batteieas more than 25% of their rating? So if it was 1400mah then the max charge rate should have been no more than 350 mah. Correct?
Ryan
I thought you were not supposed to charge Nimh batteieas more than 25% of their rating? So if it was 1400mah then the max charge rate should have been no more than 350 mah. Correct?
Ryan
Bill
#9
Member
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mechanicsville,
VA
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Nimh overheat
Gentlemen,
Someone asked "where do you get those numbers from?", Well from the Man Spec sheets of corse. Save this link: http://www.tnrtechnical.com/default.asp Go there. Click the nicad\nickel metal button, find the battery in question then look at the spec sheet. Easy. Notice that a fast charge can equal 1C for the correct cells. Amazing isn't it.
Fred
Someone asked "where do you get those numbers from?", Well from the Man Spec sheets of corse. Save this link: http://www.tnrtechnical.com/default.asp Go there. Click the nicad\nickel metal button, find the battery in question then look at the spec sheet. Easy. Notice that a fast charge can equal 1C for the correct cells. Amazing isn't it.
Fred
#10
My Feedback: (11)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Nimh overheat
ORIGINAL: azvmax
Are you sure it started at 4.9?
Its a 4 cell pack, it should of been below 4.8.
If so then it was full.
The charger still should detect peak.
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_16...tm.htm#1607487
Are you sure it started at 4.9?
Its a 4 cell pack, it should of been below 4.8.
If so then it was full.
The charger still should detect peak.
http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_16...tm.htm#1607487
Its a good thing it wasn't a LiPoly pack in your airplane with this problem. It would have done more than 'almost burned the wood in your airplane'!
#11
Senior Member
My Feedback: (16)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Locust Grove,
GA
Posts: 12,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Nimh overheat
Not true, you can charge up to 1C (1400ma) and still be within the MFG specifications.
ORIGINAL: Ryans Rebel
I thought you were not supposed to charge Nimh batteieas more than 25% of their rating? So if it was 1400mah then the max charge rate should have been no more than 350 mah. Correct?
Ryan
I thought you were not supposed to charge Nimh batteieas more than 25% of their rating? So if it was 1400mah then the max charge rate should have been no more than 350 mah. Correct?
Ryan
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Palm Bay,
FL
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Nimh overheat
Well thanks for all the input.
First I must correct the starting voltage figure. It was 4.7 volts NOT 4.9, I sorry that I mislead you with that figure. And yes, it was charged on the NiMH setting using a 12Volt booster pac as I drove to the field, less than 30 minutes.
As I see it, here is what I think happaned.
The end cell shorted internally.
It got hot enough to melt the heat shrink and melt the solder on the tab of that cell only. That cell has zero volts and 0.4 Ohms resistance and the other 3 cells, appximatel 1.4 Volts.
I can't blame this on the MK2 charger but that shorted cell sure looks suspicious .
What do you think?
First I must correct the starting voltage figure. It was 4.7 volts NOT 4.9, I sorry that I mislead you with that figure. And yes, it was charged on the NiMH setting using a 12Volt booster pac as I drove to the field, less than 30 minutes.
As I see it, here is what I think happaned.
The end cell shorted internally.
It got hot enough to melt the heat shrink and melt the solder on the tab of that cell only. That cell has zero volts and 0.4 Ohms resistance and the other 3 cells, appximatel 1.4 Volts.
I can't blame this on the MK2 charger but that shorted cell sure looks suspicious .
What do you think?
ORIGINAL: Allie33
Well:
I charged my 2 year old 1400 MA nimh pack at the recommended max rate of 1.0A on my Hobbico MK 2 field charger. Starting voltage was 4.9 V.
Voltages after meltdown are:
Burned cell 0.0v
1.21
1.26
1.27volts,
Looks like a shorted cell to me. What do you think?
I well try to connect photographs.
Well:
I charged my 2 year old 1400 MA nimh pack at the recommended max rate of 1.0A on my Hobbico MK 2 field charger. Starting voltage was 4.9 V.
Voltages after meltdown are:
Burned cell 0.0v
1.21
1.26
1.27volts,
Looks like a shorted cell to me. What do you think?
I well try to connect photographs.