Go Back  RCU Forums > Radios, Batteries, Clubhouse and more > Batteries & Chargers
 Understanding and  Measuring Cell Performance >

Understanding and Measuring Cell Performance

Community
Search
Notices
Batteries & Chargers Nicads, Nickel Metal Hydride, Lithium, LiPoly, Chargers, Cyclers, etc...

Understanding and Measuring Cell Performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-2005 | 03:56 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Frederick, MD
Default Understanding and Measuring Cell Performance

Understanding and Measuring Cell Performance

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE RAGONE CHART IS THE TRULY EFFECTIVE WAY TO EVALUATE CELL PERFORMANCE.

Study the attached chart carefully. It is the most significant tool for understanding battery performance that you will find anywhere. This particular method lets one compare any form of energy from batteries to jet engines. For now, we will stick to batteries including Li Pos and Ni MH since Ni MH is next best to Li Po for specific energy. There are several powerful observations about this chart. To date, there have been all kinds of claims made for Li Po cells, most with no substantiation; just claims about how great the cells are! The Ragone plot sorts it out in a way that lets you judge. The Ragone plot is a useful tool for many things. We haven’t time to go into all the mechanics of it here. However, you are invited to review a 2-part article that Matt Keenon wrote about it in Microflight magazine Sept//Oct 2004 that presents it fully. The Ragone plot is developed from discharge curves. Calculations are for V avg X A= watts and watts X time with both divided by cell weight.
2. The left ordinate shows what the battery can do as the wattage demanded from it increases. If some claims heard for certain chemistries are to be believed, those cells could deliver 150 amps/cell with no loss of capacity. For a realistic cell, as we increase current drain, the cell loses some capacity and voltage is depressed. If not, it would mean that the cell had zero internal resistance! This chart shows reality. The bottom scale is watts and that is the product of average voltage and average current. If, e.g., a cell shows a lot of voltage depression, then the wattage falls. If the cell can handle only, say, 5C current drain, Watt hours and watts are depressed and the only way to get higher and to the right is by paralleling packs. Note the statement at the top , right. This is why we see some packs marketed that have four packs in parallel in order to handle 40 or so amps. Those packs are very large and very heavy.
3.The red tick marks show how to get more W-H out of a given pack. The cell shown is the very popular KOK 1500, the staple of park flyers. If you try to demand > 1600 watts/kg, you won’t have much W-H and it takes W-H to get flying time. By paralleling four packs and demanding 400 watts/kg per parallel pack, you could fly for more than 20 minutes. You could fly a 4 lb model at 100 watts per pound of model and have an aggressive aerobatic model at this design point. LIPOCALC II at our web site, will let you optimize the design as it walks you through this process automatically. You input the volts you want and amps and it does the rest.
4. Flying time is the dotted red line that is derived by dividing W-H/Kg by the Watts/Kg demanded. In the example, flying time is increased from almost nothing for a 1P pack to over 20 minutes for a 4P pack.
5. As you add more cells, pack weight goes up and watt-hours goes up. Going from 1P to 2P doubles W-H, but so does weight( and obviously, cost). The key parameter is how much energy you can get from a given weight of cell as current drain is increased. This can only be done by cell selection.
6. If you divide the specific energy on the left by specific power demanded at the bottom, the run time is the product. For example, the cell shown can deliver 1250 W/kg at 120W-H/kg and 120/1250=0.096 hrs=5.76 minutes; the 2P tick mark. Since the cell weighs 0.032 Kg, the W-H= 3.84 and watts=40.

This post is to ullustrate the use and development of the Ragone plot. Posts will be added to present data for currrent cells available.
Attached Images
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Om31967.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	67.6 KB
ID:	249453  
Old 03-26-2005 | 04:07 PM
  #2  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Frederick, MD
Default RE: Understanding and Measuring Cell Performance

The Ragone Plot for Currently Available RC Cells

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. This is the progression by Kokam as Li po cells were introduced to RC. The original KOK 3270 was a 5C cell that is very light and has excellent energy density but that can not handle very much current drain. By paralleling 2P, about 20 amps can be supported. Most competing cells fall in the lower chart.. Few have gotten out of that zone thus far. The KOK 3250/5C , a 1st generation Kokam cell, has excellent specific energy but dies as you demand higher current. Trace on down to the right to the purple dotted line to see a particular cell with almost the same chemistry. The three dotted line cells here below it are typical. Let me say right now that these cells all work OK for low current drain. You reduce current drain by paralleling.
2. KOK produced a 2nd generation family that was good for 6 to 10C. The KOK 350 was the first of the third generation cells that has good specific power at low current drain but holds it flat at high drain up to 6.8 amps. The KOK 350 is one of the most popular cells in use today. The KOK 1500 was a transition cell that has outstanding specifics and carries well out to over 1400 watts/kg. The KOK 1500 is the most popular cell for park flyers. Some suppliers are now promising cells that may fall in the yellow band but only Kokams are in stock.
3.The entire new 4th generation of Kokam cells sweeps up and to the right. Up and to the right is better!
Why is it better? You can fly more airplane with less batteries and less cost, recharge in 20 minutes, and cell balancing permits this to be done. An example next frame will illustrate.
4. Our friend Don Srull speaks of the “ten minute line” and feels that is optimum for the HDR cells. That is, you fly one pack for ten minutes while you charge another, pick up your airplane, check it over, socialize, etc and keep flying all day. The ability to charge in 20 minutes with the SKYVOLT balancing charger and Kokam HDR cells makes this possible. This lets you use the pack as 1P and minimum weight.
5.The GP 3300, that is the very best Ni Mh available today, shown at the bottom is compared as apples to apples by taking the weight of the three cells that it takes to produce the approximate 3.7V that one Li Po does. Now you see the tremendous advantage that Li Po has over Ni MH. Ni Cd is far off the bottom scale since Li Po enjoys the advantage of almost five times the specific energy. The data for the GP 3300 based on zapped cells are taken from measurements by Steve Neu. A 3P pack of Li Pos that equals the weight of the 3S1P 3.3 AH Ni MH can deliver a peak of 192 amps. At an average 3.2V/cell at that drain, the wattage delivered is 3.2X192=576 watts/cell; almost 0.8 horsepower.
Attached Images
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Wu61112.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	164.7 KB
ID:	249464  
Old 03-27-2005 | 12:28 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: San Diego, CA
Default RE: Understanding and Measuring Cell Performance

"The GP 3300, that is the very best Ni Mh available today"

The GP 3700's are better. I flew my first pack of these today.

Chuck
Old 03-27-2005 | 04:53 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Frederick, MD
Default RE: Understanding and Measuring Cell Performance

If you can, please provide a discharge curve and cell weight and we can see how trhey do. Curves should be generated for at least four discharge rates and preferably six.
Old 12-11-2012 | 12:25 AM
  #5  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Budapest, HUNGARY
Default RE: Understanding and Measuring Cell Performance

Hi,

Some years have gone, but now I have a LiPo technical apsect post, and I found this topic. I think it fits the Cell performance topic.

I constructed a LiPo internal resistance measuring instrument. I provide every design documentation. If anyone is interested he can build his own, even a better version:
http://cseb.hu/lipo_rin

Regards,
Csaba

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.